weight/measurements comparison
 

I'm curious...how do your measurements compare to your weight? I feel like my size is disproportionate to my weight...I know it has a lot to do with muscle vs fat.

Height: 172cm (5'8)

weight: 67kg (147.4lbs)

measurements:
bust: 95cm (37.4in)
underbust: 77cm (30.3in)
natural waist: 77cm (30.3)
widest part of waist (1in below belly button): 96cm (37.8in)
hips: 100cm (39.3in)

clothing size: pretty much a joke in terms of usefulness for comparing anything. i wish standardization was a thing. I have one pair of size 12 (US) jeans. they're loose.

Height: 5'6

Weight: mid to high 130s

BF%: Estimated 23%

Measurements:
Bust: 34
Underbust: 28
Natural waist: 25
Widest part of waist: 29
Hips: 35

Clothing Size: Most of my clothing is US size 4 for pants and dresses. For things without a number size I'm a S. For juniors/teen I'm a S/M or a 5.

To be honest, I think measurements are overblown unless you are a serious weight lifter.

Only two matter: height and weight.

I am 5'8.5" and 170lbs ish and I weight train (but I would not consider myself serious).

At 5'8" and 147.4lbs, you are in good shape! Period.

Measurements:
Bust: 38
Natural waist: 28
Hips: 37

I'm 5'10 and 172 pounds currently. I wear a size 8 or 10 depending on cut of jeans and a size medium top.