|
|
08-30-2006, 01:49 PM
|
#1
|
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 382
S/C/G: 160/122/120
|
retouching Katie Couric
I just saw that a magazine retouched a photograph of Katie Couric to make her look slimmer:
Someone wrote a response on the site where I saw this that sums it up.
Quote:
This never happened with Dan Rather...or Tom Brokaw...or Peter Jennings...or Brian Williams....or Bob Schiefer...or Matt Lauer. Know why? Because they are MEN. Apparently despite the fact that she has 20+ years of news reporting experience, somebody still thinks she won't be watched/respected because she's not a size 4. They don't even airbrush Al Roker, and he's like, 300 pounds!! Is it any wonder girls have weight issues?
|
Apparently, the publication released an explanation for the retouch: "As far as the magazine goes, an insider insisted the publication was just following normal industry practice when it shrunk Couric."
...gotta love the "normal industry practice"
|
|
|
08-31-2006, 11:11 AM
|
#2
|
Proud Army Mom!
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: mississippi
Posts: 184
S/C/G: 202/185/165
|
Huh. Figures.
|
|
|
08-31-2006, 11:05 PM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 588
S/C/G: Size 24/Size 20/Size 8
Height: 5'7"
|
Wow. She actually looks like a real person in the original instead of like a Barbie Doll. What kind of an example would THAT set?!?
|
|
|
08-31-2006, 11:28 PM
|
#4
|
Ilene the Bean
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,538
|
I wonder if Katie knows? I somehow doubt that she would agree with this ...
|
|
|
09-01-2006, 12:13 PM
|
#5
|
No description available.
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bat Country
Posts: 6,915
|
What's wrong with looking like a real woman? Shame on those people who thought she needed fixing!
Okay, now for a rant that has been building but that I have not released:
I am actually a little (VERY) annoyed with the new advertising campaign for a hospital in town that caters to women. In this community, there are women of so many shapes and sizes and ethnicities. The women in the ad campaign? ALL BLONDE AND STICK THIN.
That's crap. Show some real women, with their beautiful faces and colors and shapes. Show a blonde, sure, and a brunette. Show a Hispanic woman, and a Navajo women and a Vietnamese woman.
I know intellectually it is 2006 but sometimes I feel like I have been warped back to the 1950s.
End of rant...please resume your regularly scheduled reading of 3FC.
|
|
|
09-01-2006, 04:17 PM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 235
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ilene
I wonder if Katie knows? I somehow doubt that she would agree with this ...
|
She responded in an interview that she didn't know about it ahead of time.
Quote:
Couric, 49, said she hadn't known about the digitally reworked version until she saw the issue. The former NBC "Today" show host told the Daily News, "I liked the first picture better because there's more of me to love."
|
http://news.aol.com/entertainment/tv...30113109990001
|
|
|
09-02-2006, 10:31 AM
|
#7
|
American ex-pat
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Essex, England
Posts: 512
S/C/G: 182/180/140
Height: 5'2"
|
It's not even like she was big in the first (real) picture! She just looked normal.
I love the new Dove adverts playing here in England. Not sure if they're playing in The States or not. Real women of different shapes, sizes and colors. A particularly good one was showing different women talking about their problem areas but laughing and still looking so beautiful for the camera while they pranced about in undies. A very positive, uplifting commercial to watch. And it makes me want to buy Dove products to support the campaign (so obviously, it's quite effective)!
|
|
|
09-02-2006, 11:46 AM
|
#8
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 36
S/C/G: 209/190/149
Height: 5'5"
|
They are airing here in the States and they are fantastic aren't they. Oprah did a show featuring some of the women a while back.
BUY DOVE!
|
|
|
09-02-2006, 01:54 PM
|
#9
|
Ilene the Bean
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,538
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1TiredGradStudent
|
Thanks for that information, I'm glad she didn't agree...
|
|
|
09-02-2006, 10:36 PM
|
#10
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 435
|
They thinned her out, whitened her teeth, darkened her outfit, made her outfit look more sleek and tailored,did something I can't quite put my finger on to her eyes, and they made her hair slightly lighter with less "red" tones. They also enhanced the colors in the background.
I find this upsetting, but I guess it is what we have learned to deal with in society. It is aggrivating when magazines/TV/Misc. entertainment industries make something not real the "ideal" for feminine beauty. It hurts. It especially hurts preteen, teen, and early twenties girls who often feel they are inferior to the faces and bodies in a magazine or on TV. If only we could understand ourselves, and make these impressionable young women see real beauty starts within, and exterior beauty is not only temporary in life- but really not that important in the grand scheme of things. There is nothing wrong with looking and feeling beautiful on the outside- but it should not rank as high up there on the importance scale as it does.
|
|
|
09-16-2006, 03:24 PM
|
#11
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 6,192
S/C/G: 190/140/135
Height: 5'7"
|
I find it outrageous. In the past couple of weeks, there were a couple of posts in General Support from women who weren't happy with themselves, their appearance. They lost weight and still didn't feel THIN ENOUGH. How could they, when they are real women, constantly bombarded with unreality. Everything we see, magazine, TV, billboards, movies is airbrushed, edited, artifically slimmed down, glossy, sleek and fake. How can we measure up to unrealistic perfection? It's sad and troubling.
|
|
|
11-14-2006, 02:14 PM
|
#13
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Florida
Posts: 254
Height: 5'5"
|
Thanks for the links! This was an eye opening thread.
|
|
|
11-14-2006, 11:21 PM
|
#14
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 919
S/C/G: 180/130/130
Height: 5'5
|
Wow!
Thank you for those links. I had heard about air-brushing and editing before, but I never imagined the reality of it before I watched the new Dove film (available at their website). I have to ask myself, by the last link - when I had seen it atleast 4 times before - why am I still so surprised?
I feel so much better about my laugh lines and skin, because even supermodels have them...before modern technology.
|
|
|
11-15-2006, 12:35 PM
|
#15
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,617
S/C/G: 266 / 179 / 165
Height: 5'7"
|
Have you seen the Jamie Lee Curtis spread where she specifically had no retouching or h&makeup and posted in her skivvies to let people know what a huge diff. all that cosmetic work makes? Good for her. Now if she'd only quit smoking!!
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:57 PM.
|