3 Fat Chicks on a Diet Weight Loss Community  

Go Back   3 Fat Chicks on a Diet Weight Loss Community > Diet Central > Weight Watchers > WW Food and Point Issues

WW Food and Point Issues ...other than recipes

Questioning points vs. calories vs. carb-counting

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-25-2011, 06:10 PM   #1
Renaissance Woman
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: California, USA
Posts: 2,591

S/C/G: 363/306/185

Height: 5'10.5"

Default Questioning points vs. calories vs. carb-counting

I've been doing WW for about four weeks. Haven't lost an ounce. In fact, I've gained. So I started tracking calories again and comparing it to points. As an example, today I've had 28 points. I still have another 19 to go for the day. But I've also eaten 1750 calories and I've only had four servings of vegetables today. I've only had 26 gm net of carbs.

It's only 3 p.m. I know I'm going to get hungry around dinner. I can load up on veggies and not go over on carbs and calories, but I won't come close to getting in all my points.

If I've been eating at points for the last three weeks, does that put my caloric intake too high?

(Just FYI - I am currently eating very low carbs, lean proteins and healthy fats - a Paleolithic diet. I feel really good when I eat like this, but I'm afraid that working with the points system gets my calories too high to lose weight.)

Would love to see some discussion here about this. Thanks.
__________________
Georgia



geoblewis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2011, 07:32 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Tampa FL
Posts: 134

S/C/G: 168/168/140

Height: 5'5

Default

This is day 2 for me coming from LC and trying to do a moderate (50-80) carbs a day WW points program, so the verdict is not in yet. Without knowing anything about your current weight/activity very hard to say if too many calories. But if you are gaining something must change.
Dee74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2011, 12:03 PM   #3
Renaissance Woman
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: California, USA
Posts: 2,591

S/C/G: 363/306/185

Height: 5'10.5"

Default

I was on the WW boards last night on their website and found others experiencing the same. It seems for us bigger folk, the WW points calculator cranks out bigger numbers. I'm nearly 6' tall and weigh 304 lbs. I was assigned 47 points. I exercise an hour daily, I don't eat past the 47 points and I'm not losing.

I'm going to restrict my points to 40/day for the next week and see what happens. Others talked about cutting their points too. From what I could tell, 29 points seems to be the minimum, but a few also stated that even at 29 points, they weren't losing weight. But they were tiny to begin with.
__________________
Georgia



geoblewis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2011, 02:23 PM   #4
Less of a Better Me
 
Koshka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,036

S/C/G: 207.4/ticker/146

Height: 5'4"

Default

Quote:
today I've had 28 points. I still have another 19 to go for the day. But I've also eaten 1750 calories and I've only had four servings of vegetables today. I've only had 26 gm net of carbs.
I think there is something wrong with how you are counting points. I have been following counting WW points and counting calories for almost a year. For the past several months I've been eating lower carb. I am not a big fruit eater but do eat veggies.

For me, I find that if I count my total calories for the day (including any fruits and veggies) and record points plus that 1 PP equals an average of about 38 calories. This does vary a bit depending on what I eat. 1 PP can be as little as 37 calories and as much as 41 for me. I have been eating lower carb for a few months. I'm currently at 80 net carbs I day having worked my way up.

So if you eat 28 PP and 1750 calories that is about 62 calories per point. That just isn't correct. Even under Momentum points where points were more calories each my average calories per point was between 47 and 50 depending on what I eat.

So -- either you aren't counting calories correctly or you aren't counting points correctly. The only way you could get to the calories you are talking about would be if you were eating huge amounts of zero point fruit but it doesn't sound like you are doing that.

It is true that higher fat food is penalized by the WW PP system and low carb diets are necessarily higher fat. When I was eating 25 to 40 net carbs I was finding that if I ate the same calories that I ate when I wasn't eating lower carb that I would be eating more PP due to the higher fat. Still that was increasing my calories by about 100 or so.

Basically I don't think it is possible to eat the number of calories you indicate and have that equal 28 points.

It might help if you could post what you ate today and portion sizes and how many points you counted each item as since I think there is something going wrong with your calculations of either points or calories.
__________________
Working on getting to Less of A Better Me!
My weight loss blog at http://lessofabetterme.com/


Koshka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2011, 04:00 PM   #5
Renaissance Woman
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: California, USA
Posts: 2,591

S/C/G: 363/306/185

Height: 5'10.5"

Default

I don't understand how I can be off on counting points if I enter everything that I eat onto their website tracking system. And I've been tracking calories for quite some time and believe to be very accurate. But now that I look things over a little more on the WW website, I may not have been accurately accounting for points on some items.

I eat a lot of zero-point vegetables (at least 8 servings daily) and only one piece of fruit. Since I don't eat grains I need to get the fiber somewhere, and it's a struggle, but the grains and legumes really do a number on me so I have to avoid them. I do tend to eat more fats, but they're from healthy fat sources such as nuts, seeds and avocados. I do cook with coconut oil. And I eat around 80 gm of protein.

I decided to cut points down to 40 or less. But yesterday I achieved satiety with 36 points and still went off my plan with overindulging on chicken, and I broke my rules and had some bread, cheese and a little sugar. That worked out to 1796 calories. 165 g of carbs, 21 gm of fiber, 76 gm of fat and 122 gm of protein.

I'm not going to worry about this tracking thing. I wanted to know if other experienced the same thing as I did. I am succeeding now with eating lower points/calories. Have finally lost a few pounds this week. More importantly, my eating style helps me feel really good.
__________________
Georgia



geoblewis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2011, 10:27 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
QuilterInVA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Yorktown, VA USA
Posts: 5,124

Default

Do you think if you followed the plan as written it would work? You are not getting in the 9 GHGs, eating too much protein and not enough healthy grains for starters. Do you get in your fruit, fat and dairy servings? You just aren't doing WW correctly so can't expect results. And if you don't weigh your portions, there is no way you can be accurate in points or calories.
__________________
Susan

HW 356 pounds - CW 138 - GW 130


Life isn't about waiting for the storm to pass. It's about learning to dance in the rain.

Forget Yesterday. I am, where I am. I know where I could have been, had I done what I did not do. Tell me, Friend, what I can do today, to be where I want to be tomorrow. - Sigrad
QuilterInVA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2011, 11:07 AM   #7
Renaissance Woman
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: California, USA
Posts: 2,591

S/C/G: 363/306/185

Height: 5'10.5"

Default

I actually do weigh and measure things like proteins and fats. I don't measure the vegetables. I don't do dairy or grains because of food sensitivities. I only have a single apple a day due to type 2 diabetes and carb sensitivity. I eat like this because I feel really good eating like this.

Really, the only thing that has worked is cutting the calories/points. Today was my weigh in day and I finally dropped nearly 2 lbs. The only thing I changed was the points.
__________________
Georgia



geoblewis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2011, 01:42 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
sarahyu's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: DC metro area
Posts: 1,585

S/C/G: 197/199/145

Height: 5'0"

Default

Personally I think it's a matter of tweaking things to fit you. I find that I can't eat all my weekly points + activity points and lose weight. I will maintain or have a slight increase but definately not lose.

I'm not sure how effiecient it is to do WW with a paleo diet. You won't be getting the dairy, beans or whole grains. I would find it difficult to do. But hey, you've find a way to make it work. Good for you.
__________________
49 years old, 5' highest weight-199lbs . Started SBD Jan 2004, lost 47 pounds in 6 months, then slowly gained it all back.

sarahyu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2011, 03:43 PM   #9
Less of a Better Me
 
Koshka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,036

S/C/G: 207.4/ticker/146

Height: 5'4"

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by geoblewis View Post

I'm not going to worry about this tracking thing. I wanted to know if other experienced the same thing as I did. I am succeeding now with eating lower points/calories. Have finally lost a few pounds this week. More importantly, my eating style helps me feel really good.
I'm not trying to be a pest. It is just that I know that if you eat 28 points that can't equate to over 1700 calories even with 8 veggie servings and 1 fruit serving. Non-starchy veggies just don't that many calories. I mention this only because it makes me think there is something wrong in what you are recording either for points or calories.

The thing is to find the calorie level that you will lose on. If that is 1700 calories a day (you are much taller than I am so I understand that can work for someone is a lot taller) then I would focus on that.
__________________
Working on getting to Less of A Better Me!
My weight loss blog at http://lessofabetterme.com/


Koshka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012, 11:33 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
happybug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 207

S/C/G: 69kg/65/60

Height: 5ft

Default

I think you should do what works for you. I did the ww points five years ago and lost 11kg. Since then I use the points when I want to keep on track or lose weight. I found the ww system worked for me, as I didn't want to give up or restrict myself. If you're not already keeping a daily food diary then it's really beneficial. I'd be inclined to reduce your points or calories and see how you go. If a combination of points and calorie counting works for you, then use it. Losing weight is hard work. The main thing is you're doing something to achieve a loss. I found cutting out all butter, marg and cooking oil really made a difference. Using a dry pan, baking, or using a spray instead. Good luck and let us know if things improve.
happybug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2012, 05:58 AM   #11
Member
 
JennaR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 55

S/C/G: 180/150/130

Default

I agree with the posters who are saying that there's a mistake somewhere in the counting..

I count calories but a friend does WW and we compared our daily food intake for fun one day. She's currently eating 26 points per day and when she tallies up each food items calorie count she's ingesting roughly 1300 calories.
__________________
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JennaR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2012, 11:25 AM   #12
Madeleine
 
fatmad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: rural southwestern Ontario Canada
Posts: 2,348

S/C/G: sw187/cw186/gw120

Height: 5 ft 3.5 in or 163 cm

Default

I have been eating low carb for a long time, and after an initial weight loss, just couldn't budge more, or maintain to the level I had lost initially. I am also keeping carbs low (60-80/day) as I am prediabetic. So far my sugars are doing fine, which is interesting, because some of these foods have spiked my sugars before. I had to reduce fat pretty dramatically though, as atkins replaces carbs with fats (basically, I won't get into nuances, so no flames please about not understanding atkins), and that has been a challenge.
I would discuss making changes with your leader and plan accordingly.
good luck
__________________
Fatmad

zen and the art of weight loss, finding the true path of en-lighten-ment

fatmad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2012, 11:11 AM   #13
Senior Member
 
QuilterInVA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Yorktown, VA USA
Posts: 5,124

Default

The problem is you aren't following the plan. Maybe you should try it as written. Do you weigh and measure your food or just eyeball portions? You should always use nuts on the package if you can.
__________________
Susan

HW 356 pounds - CW 138 - GW 130


Life isn't about waiting for the storm to pass. It's about learning to dance in the rain.

Forget Yesterday. I am, where I am. I know where I could have been, had I done what I did not do. Tell me, Friend, what I can do today, to be where I want to be tomorrow. - Sigrad
QuilterInVA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2012, 12:24 PM   #14
Less of a Better Me
 
Koshka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,036

S/C/G: 207.4/ticker/146

Height: 5'4"

Default

Susan

I don't know who you are responding to but it is certainly possible to follow the WW plan and eat low carb. I did it for 6 months....
__________________
Working on getting to Less of A Better Me!
My weight loss blog at http://lessofabetterme.com/


Koshka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2012, 10:35 PM   #15
pursuer of joy
 
124chicksinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: northern New Jersey
Posts: 827

S/C/G: 198/170ish/160-???

Height: 5.6 on a tall day

Default

I'm a WWPP dropout, but a weight loss success. Do what works FOR YOU.

I wish you good luck in your efforts.
__________________



Is that your final answer?

Last edited by 124chicksinger : 02-12-2012 at 10:41 PM.
124chicksinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Posts by members, moderators and admins are not considered medical advice
and no guarantee is made against accuracy.


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:27 PM.






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2