3 Fat Chicks on a Diet Weight Loss Community  

Go Back   3 Fat Chicks on a Diet Weight Loss Community > Fitness > Weight and Resistance Training

Weight and Resistance Training Boost weight loss, and look great!

How much can you tolerate in dumbbell weight before it's too much?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-14-2008, 11:26 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
sportmom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,617

S/C/G: 266 / 179 / 165

Height: 5'7"

Default How much can you tolerate in dumbbell weight before it's too much?

So, I'm back with the dilemma I experienced about 2 years ago with getting to a point where the dumbbells are too heavy but I need to go up in weight.

This is for my squats. I'm up to 35 lbs on each side now, and I swear, I feel like I'm getting gumbi arms that will have me dragging my knuckles on the ground soon. Plus, it really hurts my hands if that makes sense - not to mention lifting them to get them back on the rack. So I'm back at the point of looking at a barbell bc I don't think I will be able to hoist 40s up, and yet I haven't got the equipment to do the barbell yet. You may remember if you've been here awhile that I bought an ez curl bar thinking the curve was for your neck to fit in. I've struggled to find a bar that doesn't kill my neck so much that I can't even finish one set. I've used a towel, the foam from a pool noodle. I guess it just takes getting used to, but I don't even have the plates to make 40 lbs on each side. Before I go down that road again of pricing affordable plates, I thought I would ask, at what point you experienced people had to move from dumbbells to a bar. Is 35 really the breaking point, or should I just tough it out because it's really possible to carry 40 or even 50 lbs dumbbells in each hand? I just feel like my legs have more capacity to increase weight than my hands can support at this time. (I think this is why M&M use lifting straps, right ladies? Maybe thatwould help?) Thanks.
sportmom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2008, 11:30 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The Deep South
Posts: 4,445

S/C/G: 237/165.8/130

Height: 5'4"

Default

You shouldn't be placing the bar on your NECK.

If you stand up straight and push your shoulders back, you'll find that your delts form a natural shelf right above your shoulderblades. That's where you rest the bar. And NOT an ez bar. Ouch! I can't imagine putting an ez bar on my neck - I can see where that would hurt.

I have never used barbells for a squat - I can't imagine doing so, because I think it would unbalance me. I also can see that I would pretty quickly exceed my grasp ability.

If there's a trainer at your gym who could help you in positioning the bar across your shoulders (not your neck), I think that would help you a lot.

.
PhotoChick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2008, 11:35 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
Onsecondthought's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 104

Default

I was using barbells as well to do my squats, but then I got to a point where holding the weights in my hands threw me out of proper alignment. My form was getting totally screwed up and it was hurting my back more than helping my legs. I switched to the max rack and have never looked back. I'm squatting twice as much as I ever did with the barbells with absolutely no stress on my arms or back.
Onsecondthought is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2008, 11:44 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The Deep South
Posts: 4,445

S/C/G: 237/165.8/130

Height: 5'4"

Default

Check out this video for proper squat form:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kawBY...eature=related

This one shows you that the bar is NOT on her neck, but across her shoulders and delts:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qbBs...eature=related

This one he teaches the overhead squat, but still very clearly stating that the bar is over the SHOULDERBLADES, not the head or the neck:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PCWLs1jTOVE

Hope that helps some!

.
PhotoChick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2008, 12:09 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
sportmom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,617

S/C/G: 266 / 179 / 165

Height: 5'7"

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PhotoChick View Post
I have never used barbells for a squat - I can't imagine doing so, because I think it would unbalance me. I also can see that I would pretty quickly exceed my grasp ability.
Chick, did you mean to say DUMBBELLS for a squat here? I'm confused if not.
sportmom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2008, 12:20 PM   #6
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 13

S/C/G: 185 / 182.5 / 150

Height: 5'5

Default another way to hold the bar bell

First I want to say wow on the 35 lbs on each side -

At the gym I go to we use a body bar - which is basically a slightly padded and weighted bar bell. I have no idea how much they cost or how heavy you can get them but just an idea. Most people in class put them across there shoulders, but some hold them in the crook of there arms - kind of x your arms across the front of you and place the bar in the elbow bends. I hope this makes sense. That is the modification for those that don't want it across their neck
3callmemom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2008, 12:21 PM   #7
Kallos Sthenos
 
Lydia227's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Columbus, Ohio and Burke, VA
Posts: 1,658

S/C/G: 188/127/120

Height: 5'3''

Default

Fran: I made the transfer to the Olympic bar and a squat rack when the twenty pound dumbells became too light for me. The transition was because I felt it was safer to squat in a rack as I progressed with a heavier weight and because of hand size. I'm such a delicate, small creature ya know. Really, gripping two 45 or 50 pound dumbells in my hands is not the way for me to go.

Seriously, spend an hour with a personal trainer and have someone coach you through a squat session with a bar. Review the videos before as well as after and keep studying the squat as well. There are so many things to keep in mind when doing them it does take time to find the best spot on your delts. There's high positioning and low positioning. I have mine checked every once in a while too.

One of the most important things to remember about your form in that your shoulders are squared and pulled back. Tight. Your core is tight, your chin is slightly up, and your hips, glutes move back like you were pushing the wall out behind you. Probably a lot like what you are currently doing.

Good luck.
__________________
InspirationMotivation Perspiration
:Rejuvenation:
Lydia227 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2008, 01:23 PM   #8
Just Me
 
nelie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 15,309

S/C/G: 364/202/182

Height: 5'6"

Default

I have a 35 lb kettlebell I can hold with one hand, the 45 lb kettlebell requires 2 hands My dumbbells go to 25 lbs.

I squat with a bar and I do try to make a shelf. I'm still trying to perfect my squatting though.
__________________
You can't out-exercise poor eating habits.
nelie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2008, 01:37 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The Deep South
Posts: 4,445

S/C/G: 237/165.8/130

Height: 5'4"

Default

Quote:
Chick, did you mean to say DUMBBELLS for a squat here? I'm confused if not.
Whoops. Sorry, yeah. My fingers got ahead of my brain.

.
PhotoChick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2008, 10:08 PM   #10
Ilene the Bean
 
Ilene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 11,716

S/C/G: 165/149/140

Height: 5'3"

Default

At my gym they have a rubber neck thing that clips on the bar to sit properly on your shoulders, I think it's called a Manta-Rae or something like that. It makes squating much easier on the shoulders.
__________________
I l e n e
Falling down is not failure....Failure is staying down.

Ilene is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2008, 07:34 AM   #11
Mel
Senior Member
 
Mel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 6,963

Default

I use the foam roller pad that goes around the barbell with velcro to keep it there. Fran, without a squat rack, I doubt you can do much more with a barbell. At home, (no squat rack), I do front squats and overhead squats with the bar with at most 15 pounds per side, because I can't do the hoist up to shoulder level with more.

An alternative would be single dumbbell squats, but if you have problems racking the 35s, that may not be an option. I can manage to pull a 95 -105 pounder off the bottom rack, do a set and put it back. I find it much easier to keep my form good with a single weight. Hold it by the plate at one end with both hands.

Mel
__________________
Falling down is not failure....Failure is staying down.
Save the Earth, it's the only planet with chocolate and wine.

It isn't about waiting for the storm to pass...
It's about learning to dance in the rain.

9 years at or under goal weight! Working Maintenance Everyday
Mel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2008, 09:23 AM   #12
Senior Member
 
sportmom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,617

S/C/G: 266 / 179 / 165

Height: 5'7"

Default

Thanks Mel. Mine max out at 55 so going to one won't help me here. I do have a very basic squat rack, so that is an option. It came with the new bench I got last year, I just didn't get the right barbell and plates to go w/it because I was staggered by the price. Here is my bench and rack set. The bench pulls apart from the rack, which is nice so you can get in under the rack for a squat. Only downside from reading the reviews is that I would have to get a 7' bar as a 6' is too narrow, and some women complain that a 7' bar is too heavy and unstable for them to use. Won't know til I try I guess. I also bought this bench because it had an atch for doing hamstring curls, but unfor, the angle is bad and the padding insufficient and it feels more like a torture device.

sportmom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2008, 10:01 AM   #13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The Deep South
Posts: 4,445

S/C/G: 237/165.8/130

Height: 5'4"

Default

Quote:
and some women complain that a 7' bar is too heavy and unstable for them to use.
Nah. I use an olympic bar, which is 7' and 45lbs. A lot of the stability comes from where you hold it .. .and if it's balanced properly across your delts, then it's not going to be unstable. This is one of those areas where form is everything. The first time I did squats unsupported, I thought the same thing. I fell into that "women need smaller" mindset again. But once my trainer taught me the proper form, I realized that the olympic bar was just fine.

One thing ... once you get used to the weight of the bar and learn where to settle it on your shoulders, most trainers advise that you lose the foam roller padding. It makes it easier for the bar to slip or turn on your back. The narrowness of the bare bar actually works for you, in fitting into the "shelf" made by your delts and shoulderblades. When you add the padding of the wrap, you remove that benefit.

.
PhotoChick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2008, 10:15 AM   #14
Senior Member
 
sportmom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,617

S/C/G: 266 / 179 / 165

Height: 5'7"

Default

I think I'm still working toward building my "shelf". I still really have a fatback right now with no type of definition. Thanks for the tip!
sportmom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2008, 10:20 AM   #15
Meg
Senior Member
 
Meg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Posts: 9,160

S/C/G: 257/135/maintaining

Height: 5' 4"

Default

I've never been able to do squats using any significant weight without my beloved squat pad. Up to 100# -- no problem but over that, I get nasty bruises even when the bar is in exactly the right place.

Fortunately the bar doesn't slip or roll because of the way the pad velcros tightly around the bar. I've seen some worn out pads in the gym that do have a tendency to roll, but it's because the padding is worn out and it doesn't fit tightly around the bar any longer.

A lot of women don't have enough muscle or fat on their backs and shoulders to protect themselves from a fully loaded squat bar. If that's the case, a squat pad is an acceptable aid. I know I could try and build massive traps, but it's just not a look I'm after.
__________________
Meg
Start: 257 - June 1, 2001
Goal: 135 - May 12, 2002
Size 22/size 4
Meg is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Posts by members, moderators and admins are not considered medical advice
and no guarantee is made against accuracy.


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:51 PM.






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2