|
|
11-21-2006, 10:18 PM
|
#16
|
Blonde Bimbo
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 2,984
S/C/G: 250+/144/135
Height: 5' 4"
|
I had done one of these years ago, but had to update it.
Here's my model:
And here's me:
I haven't lost all the baby weight yet. I was 140 in that real after picture and 145 on the model currently.
|
|
|
11-21-2006, 10:23 PM
|
#17
|
Blonde Bimbo
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 2,984
S/C/G: 250+/144/135
Height: 5' 4"
|
That site will let you go up to 310 pounds. I was between 250 and 260 there. But the model, at 250, looks nothing like my shape. I was much larger looking. I tried the model at 310 and the size/shape of it doesn't change at all from 250. They need to tweek their program.
|
|
|
11-22-2006, 02:26 AM
|
#18
|
Coldblooded Thread Killa
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 396
Height: 5'3"
|
Holy Toledo, what an eye-opener! Looks quite a bit like me, too.
This is me, going from 238 to 140.
Last edited by callystia; 11-24-2006 at 04:18 AM.
|
|
|
11-22-2006, 09:27 AM
|
#19
|
Here we go again...
Join Date: May 2006
Location: MN
Posts: 1,209
S/C/G: 176/ticker/155
Height: 5'5"/ 65 in
|
My turn! The before doesn't look a lot like me. I think I have bigger hips (43" - that model's is probably much less).
~165 ~130
Hmmm...I agree with the others that they need to tweak their program. I'm not seeing much of a difference here.
|
|
|
11-22-2006, 04:04 PM
|
#20
|
Co-Mod
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,585
S/C/G: 272/129/127
|
Tisha--- oh, I'm sorry if I came off as an *** in that post, no need to thank, it is a public site and I learned of it from someone here a year or so ago!
So, we are just passing the news along lol.
As for it looking like me: well, I actually have tiny boobs (so, I am actually getting a bigger boob job--and lift!). And also, when I was bigger I had a double tummy and that unsightliness is not there.
Actually, overall, that is one tight and firm heavier model!! She has nice upper arms a big--but flat--tummy and great skin......no flab in sight! I wish, lol.
|
|
|
11-22-2006, 04:08 PM
|
#21
|
It's working this time!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 388
S/C/G: 235/212/175
Height: 5' 1.5"
|
No, no, no. That's not what I meant. LOL I just meant that I meant to thank you, but forgot.
|
|
|
11-23-2006, 01:12 AM
|
#22
|
space cowboy
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: vermont
Posts: 3
S/C/G: 220/215/160
Height: 5'6"
|
I never really have a good perception of my size, so I really like sites like this.
And all I have to say is... HOLY CRAP!! I knew I was fat, but wow. That was quite the eye-opener, and probably just the motivation I needed Just before the most challenging day of the year, diet-wise! Should be interesting. Thanks for the link!
|
|
|
11-23-2006, 09:05 AM
|
#23
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Olathe, KS
Posts: 1,390
S/C/G: 307/172/153.5 (half of SW)
Height: 5'8''
|
My "before" VM is missing her double spare tires and the "current" one is missing her deflated double spare tires. And they're both missing my hunk of fat that sits on top of my butt and the new VM is missing the 6 inches of hanging arm skin! I'm not going to post them, because neither of them look anything like my body. But if I get extensive reconstructive surgery (which I plan to do), I CAN look more like the VM!!
|
|
|
11-23-2006, 09:14 AM
|
#24
|
Coldblooded Thread Killa
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 396
Height: 5'3"
|
Hm. It begins to sound like "virtual" models aren't any better representation of actual everyday women than real, live ones are!
Last edited by callystia; 11-23-2006 at 09:50 AM.
|
|
|
11-23-2006, 02:00 PM
|
#25
|
Learning To Fly...
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 441
S/C/G: 307/Ticker/150
Height: 5'4
|
Here is mine! 240 - 150, I even did one with an outfit on.
|
|
|
11-23-2006, 03:30 PM
|
#26
|
Coldblooded Thread Killa
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 396
Height: 5'3"
|
Hmm...there seems to be a glitch. Out of curiosity, I put in the highest weight allowable--I think it's 310? And there's not a lick of difference according to that site, between how I would have looked then, and how I would've looked at 250. I don't know if there's just a limit to how many times you can change the number and have it regenerate the graphic, or if there's a problem with my using Firefox instead of IE, but it was a little weird. I'm pretty sure 60 pounds would make at least some difference. *scratches head*
|
|
|
11-23-2006, 08:29 PM
|
#27
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3
|
Here are mine
Last edited by KimmyKitty; 11-23-2006 at 08:58 PM.
|
|
|
11-23-2006, 08:51 PM
|
#28
|
Co-Mod
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,585
S/C/G: 272/129/127
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by callystia
Hmm...there seems to be a glitch. Out of curiosity, I put in the highest weight allowable--I think it's 310? And there's not a lick of difference according to that site, between how I would have looked then, and how I would've looked at 250. I don't know if there's just a limit to how many times you can change the number and have it regenerate the graphic, or if there's a problem with my using Firefox instead of IE, but it was a little weird. I'm pretty sure 60 pounds would make at least some difference. *scratches head*
|
No, you are absolutely right, there is no difference. I don't get it either. I really don't know what that is all about.
|
|
|
11-23-2006, 10:13 PM
|
#29
|
Blonde Bimbo
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 2,984
S/C/G: 250+/144/135
Height: 5' 4"
|
You should try a model at 4' 10" or less and 310 pounds. She looks just like a 5' 4", 250 pound model. They REALLY need to work on that.
|
|
|
11-25-2006, 10:02 AM
|
#30
|
Wastin' Away Again!
Join Date: May 2006
Location: on the beach
Posts: 2,313
S/C/G: 192/170/130
Height: 5'3" 50 years old
|
Darn it. The page is not working for me. Everytime I try to "create" my model, I get nothing but those little red x marks & broken squares where a pic ought to be. It won't even let me sign in or anything. Waaaaahhhh.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:20 PM.
|