3 Fat Chicks on a Diet Weight Loss Community  

Go Back   3 Fat Chicks on a Diet Weight Loss Community > Support Forum > Weight Loss Support

Weight Loss Support Give and get support here!

How can this be???

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-05-2006, 02:06 AM   #1
No Excuses~Better Choices
 
Fat in Hong Kong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Brit living in Hong Kong
Posts: 649

S/C/G: 14st 2lbs/14st 2lbs/9st 9lbs

Height: 5'4"

Default How can this be???

I was reading an article today in a magazine about a woman who had lost a lot of weight ... I was interested in it because she started off the same size as me and was the same height ... but what I couldn't get my head around was the fact that she weighed far more than I do when she started ... How can this be???

She was 5'4" tall, size UK18, and weighed 16st 4lbs ... I am 5'4" tall, size UK18-20, and I weigh 13st 5lbs ... How on earth can two people of the same height, with a difference in weight of 3 stones (42lbs!), be the same dress size? I could understand it if the difference was say 10-20lbs, but 42lbs?!! The only thing that I can think of is perhaps she had very fat hands or huge feet ... or something!

Maybe I'm really only a size UK14!
__________________
Nichola

"If you can dream it, you can live it - you just need to work out how to make it happen."

Started SBD 07 Jan 2013

Fat in Hong Kong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2006, 03:07 AM   #2
Little Miss Random
 
sh3l5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: West Midlands, UK
Posts: 1,810

Height: 5 ft 6

Default

clothes size are wierd. At 154 I am a size UK14.
__________________

The difference between success and failure is the determination to suceed
Every Little Helps

sh3l5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2006, 03:31 AM   #3
American ex-pat
 
Mummy_Tummy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Essex, England
Posts: 508

S/C/G: 174/167/130

Height: 5'2"

Default

I think it's the way the extra weight is proportioned. Like for me, I'm 163, am 5'2" and wear a UK 12. I have slender hips, bum and legs, though. I carry all my weight in my boobs and belly. My size 12s are getting very loose on me but I'm not quite ready for a 10 yet.
__________________
Spring Challenge
Mummy_Tummy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2006, 03:42 AM   #4
dum dee dum
 
passionfruit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 140

S/C/G: 213/185/140

Height: 5'7"

Default

Oh I'm experiencing deja vu! Except, the woman weighed less (before losing), despite being the same height and size as me.

She may have weighed more in lean body mass (i.e. bones, muscle, blood, organs). Or you could be right, you may actually be a UK 14.
I had an old pair of jeans that said "size 22" and they appeared to be the same size as 3 of my size 16 jeans. Either clothes sizes are just going haywire or our weight is bouncing up and down all the time (not likely!)
__________________
Highest: 220 (lbs)
Start: 213
Restart: 188

Short term:


Long term:

Last edited by passionfruit : 11-05-2006 at 03:45 AM. Reason: typo
passionfruit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2006, 04:45 AM   #5
trouble
 
isthatreallyme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 121

S/C/G: 240/219/160

Height: 5'4

Default

well clothes sizes are fairly inconsistent, but it is definitely possible.... As I posted on another thread here, I am currently in a north american 16/18 (approximately). Look how much I weigh. I lost weight once before and at 190 lbs I was a north american 12/14. There is a big difference in the actual size of someone depending on whether they are leaner or softer. I tend to be very lean because I have always been quite active. If you aren't a gym goer or aren't active in other ways, then you may be on the softer side, and therefore slightly larger. It also depends on how your weight is distributed, what body type you are.
__________________
Mini-Goal:



Goal:

isthatreallyme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2006, 06:35 AM   #6
No Excuses~Better Choices
 
Fat in Hong Kong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Brit living in Hong Kong
Posts: 649

S/C/G: 14st 2lbs/14st 2lbs/9st 9lbs

Height: 5'4"

Default

Passionfruit ... I'm under absolutely no illusions ... I know I'm definitely NOT a UK14 (Oh, how I wish I was!!) ... But I still find it hard to believe how someone who's 42lbs heavier than me can be the same dress size, when they are the same height I realise that different body shapes have something to do with this ... whether your a pear or apple shape, or whatever ... but 42lbs is a LOT of difference ... it just doesn't seem fair ... why couldn't I be the one with heavy bones, blood, muscles, organs? ... Instead I got the fat belly, big bum and flabby thighs!
__________________
Nichola

"If you can dream it, you can live it - you just need to work out how to make it happen."

Started SBD 07 Jan 2013

Fat in Hong Kong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2006, 12:42 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
SwimGirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Posts: 4,312

S/C/G: 273/260.1/163

Height: 5'7"

Default

My mom and I weigh the same, only I'm a size 16 and she's a size 22/24. It's all about how you carry your weight, muscles, bones, etc. I have a large frame, vs my mom who is small. Lately I am learning not to compare myself to anyone else, because it just ends up being frustrating for me.

-Aimee
__________________


November Goal: 2.5 down / 2.5 to go!
SwimGirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2006, 12:48 PM   #8
Just Me
 
nelie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 15,177

S/C/G: 364/202/182

Height: 5'6"

Default

Muscle can make a huge difference. Since muscle weighs more than fat, someone who has more muscle can weigh a lot more than someone with less muscle and the same size. Bones can make a slight difference as well. Some people have a smaller bone structure than others. I know I'm on the medium/large side for my bone structure. I used to have a friend that had a very small bone structure, she weighed less than me, but she wore a bigger size than me in both her top and her bottom. The reasonings as I figured them were that she had a smaller bone structure and she had less muscle than me.
__________________
You can't out-exercise poor eating habits.
nelie is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2006, 01:22 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ontario's West Coast
Posts: 13,968

S/C/G: 165/147/128

Height: 5'3"

Default

I'm in with the body composition theory.
At 121 lbs I bought a pair of black dress slacks, a girls size 16, which I wore with control top pantyhose. Now, I wear them without and they look just fine. At least 10 lbs heavier.
__________________
... Susan
Eat good food. Move yourself. Lift something.

You'll be surprised how much you don't miss grain.
srmb60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2006, 08:17 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
kateful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 426

S/C/G: 180.5/157.5/145

Default

Doesn't it also depend on the type of clothing one wears and how tight they wear them? I'm almost 5'9". At 180, I weighed the same as a coworker who was 5'5". Although she's much more pear shaped than I and so much shorter, we wore the same size. But she wore her clothes a lot tighter than I did and she wore quite sturdy and restritive undergarments, which I don't do. Additionally, if you carry your weight on your bottom half and wear empire waist dresses, you can pack a lot more in there.
__________________


"It's a sad day when you find out that it's not accident or time or fortune, but yourself that kept things from you."~~Lillian Hellman
kateful is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2006, 09:14 PM   #11
Constant Vigilance
 
BlueToBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Fremont, CA
Posts: 2,818

S/C/G: 150/132/<130

Height: just under 5'4"

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by isthatreallyme View Post
There is a big difference in the actual size of someone depending on whether they are leaner or softer.
Isthatreally me is so right! Comparing the two of us just further proves this point. I am 5'3" and when I weighed 150 lbs I wore a north american size 14 and it was starting to feel tight. Yet I weighed 40lbs less than Isthatreally me weighed when wearing a size 12/14 (we are almost the same height and even at 40lbs less there was no way I could get into a size 12 in any brand at that weight). But I had been very inactive for well over a decade so I probably had a lot more fat and a lot less muscle than Isthatreallyme, who was active. 10 years of gaining fat and losing muscle really doesn't do much for your clothing size!

Muscle weighs more but takes up less room than fat, so people who are muscular are going to wear a smaller size (apparently sometimes a much smaller size) than people who weigh the same but with less muscle. It's not the bones, blood and organs you need to worry about; it's the amount of fat you are carrying around versus the amount of muscle you have.
__________________
- Barbara

My Before and After Pics

"Decide what you want; decide what you're willing to exchange for it; establish your priorities, and go to work." --H.L. Hunt

"Life has hills. Set the treadmill at an incline."
BlueToBlue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2006, 11:57 PM   #12
Blonde Bimbo
 
almostheaven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 2,984

S/C/G: 250+/144/135

Height: 5' 4"

Default

My cousin weighed more than I did, and looked larger. She carried hers all in the stomach and mine was all over. I was more wide than anything. So we were surprised to find we wore the same size pants. Looking at us, you'd have never guessed it.
__________________
Pre-pregnancy:

Post-pregnancy:
almostheaven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2006, 01:16 AM   #13
No Excuses~Better Choices
 
Fat in Hong Kong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Brit living in Hong Kong
Posts: 649

S/C/G: 14st 2lbs/14st 2lbs/9st 9lbs

Height: 5'4"

Default

Right, I get it now ... It's the fat versus muscle ... but this woman certainly wasn't fit and muscular by any stretch of the imagination ... she looked very fat and flabby, just like me ... I guess her muscle must've been hiding beneath the flab. It's about time I tried to find mine!
__________________
Nichola

"If you can dream it, you can live it - you just need to work out how to make it happen."

Started SBD 07 Jan 2013

Fat in Hong Kong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2006, 08:40 AM   #14
dum dee dum
 
passionfruit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 140

S/C/G: 213/185/140

Height: 5'7"

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat in Hong Kong View Post
Passionfruit ... I'm under absolutely no illusions ... I know I'm definitely NOT a UK14 (Oh, how I wish I was!!)
Forgive me, I misinterpreted that
__________________
Highest: 220 (lbs)
Start: 213
Restart: 188

Short term:


Long term:
passionfruit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2006, 08:45 AM   #15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ontario's West Coast
Posts: 13,968

S/C/G: 165/147/128

Height: 5'3"

Default

Nichola ... those muscles are under there. I guarantee ya! it's awesome to find them! Go for it!
__________________
... Susan
Eat good food. Move yourself. Lift something.

You'll be surprised how much you don't miss grain.
srmb60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Posts by members, moderators and admins are not considered medical advice
and no guarantee is made against accuracy.


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:19 PM.






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2