3 Fat Chicks on a Diet Weight Loss Community  

Go Back   3 Fat Chicks on a Diet Weight Loss Community > Support Forum > Weight Loss Support

Weight Loss Support Give and get support here!

Losing Fast or Slow - Which is Best?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-20-2006, 01:47 PM   #1
Brit Chick
 
penpal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Beautiful Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,438

Height: 5' 5"

Arrow Losing Fast or Slow - Which is Best?

I have been thinking about the two main schools of thought about losing weight by counting calories.

One says that it's best to reduce calories by a small amount in the beginning, i.e. if you are 250 lbs. you need 'x' number of calories to maintain that weight so you should only reduce your calories by a small amount from what you are currently eating. Then, as you lose weight, you need to gradually eat less and less calories till you reach your goal (as your weight decreases and you need less calories to maintain your body) at which time you will (hopefully) be eating the correct amount of calories to maintain your body at your goal weight. This method usually results in slower weight loss.

The other theory is that you immediately reduce calories to a much lower amount, say, 1200 calories and only consume more calories once you have reached your goal until you find the 'tipping point' where you begin to gain weight. The lower calorie route usually means you will reach your goal weight quicker than the above.

These are obviously diametrically opposed approaches and I was wondering which one is the more successful for long term weight loss. It would be interesting to hear from people who have tried either of these methods and been successful.
__________________
Penny ~~~Quitting is not an option!~~~



Thanksgiving Goal
penpal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2006, 01:50 PM   #2
<333
 
Stephanieee<3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 68

S/C/G: 283/251/180

Height: 5' 4

Exclamation

I am a 1200 calorie a dayer! It works really good for me, and I love it. Id recomend it. It really works well for me.

BUT Im new at it. 3 weeks. So no tipping point YET, <3
__________________
Offical Goal :

Mini Goal :


I met the mini goal!! Whoot!!! <33

Everyone Loves a Hug
Stephanieee<3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2006, 01:56 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ontario's West Coast
Posts: 13,968

S/C/G: 165/147/128

Height: 5'3"

Default

Well, I don't know about anything scientific, for sure ...
But ... I jumped in at 1200 calories. Lost 30 pounds in two months and gained 20 of them back ... quick. Lots of folks sort of jump start and keep track of what's happening. Instead of thinking "I'm losing more than 2 lbs a week, I'd better eat a little more." I thought "Yahoo, can I make this go quicker."
Then I (stupidly) went back to 'normal' eating.
Only from personal experience can I say that tweaking sensibly as you go better prepares you for the transition to maintenance.
__________________
... Susan
Eat good food. Move yourself. Lift something.

You'll be surprised how much you don't miss grain.
srmb60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2006, 01:56 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 246

Default

Not everybody is the same.
I'm a calorie counter. No specific plan. 1200 would have been too low for me at any point. In fact, I started off at around 1500 and my nurse practitioner told me that was too low for me. So I raised my intake to around 1800 and still lost weight. I'm 5'6" and around 145 lbs now and am trying to maintain at this point. I aim for around 1800-2000 on an average day (which means most weekdays-not weekends, which are prob around 2200-2400)
I know that for ME, 1200 would have left me feeling weak and set me up for a binge. But everyone's different.
lipidful is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2006, 02:01 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ontario's West Coast
Posts: 13,968

S/C/G: 165/147/128

Height: 5'3"

Default

I thought of something else ....
In a perfect world people would know how many calories they DO eat and could start cutting from the top down.
__________________
... Susan
Eat good food. Move yourself. Lift something.

You'll be surprised how much you don't miss grain.
srmb60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2006, 02:01 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,343

Default

I've lost weight with both methods. However, it has been gradually reducing calories that has provided me with long term results. Not only was it the least dramatic physically but it provided me with plenty of time to learn how to MANAGE my weight as opposed to only knowing how to lose pounds.

That isn't to say that dropping your calorie intake and staying there until you reach your goal won't work - it just didn't work for ME. I found, through trial and error, that I need more flexiblity in my day to day life than that approach allowed.
__________________
Lucky

lucky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2006, 02:25 PM   #7
Mel
Senior Member
 
Mel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 6,963

Default

I radically changed EVERYTHING when I decided to finally lose the weight. I was probably eating more like 900-1200 calories, exercising (cardio, weights and tennis) at least 2 hours a day, and changed the types of food I ate (no processed, no sugar) in addition to the amount. This may not have been the healthiest plan and I was hungry, but it sure worked. No plateaus, no cheats, and the types of food I was eating to lose are what I still eat. I've maintained the loss for almost 5 years.

During those 5 years, I radically altered my exercise and I think that's what has enabled me to maintain. I can eat more because I lift heavy, have a lot of muscle, and do a lot of cardio. I still don't eat a lot to maintain. Perhaps that's a funtion of having lost on such low calories for the amount of exercise I was doing, or from a 30 year history of food/exercise abuse, or just my age and personal metabolic profile. Whatever the reason, it is what it is. I personally need to lose quickly enough to keep seeing results. I lost at a steady 2 pounds per week rate after the first honeymoon week. I'm in awe of those of you who can live through long plateaus without losing your minds!

I really don't think there is a "best" way. I know we preach slow and steady and learn to maintain along the way, but unless I saw results, I know I would have given up.

Mel
__________________
Falling down is not failure....Failure is staying down.
Save the Earth, it's the only planet with chocolate and wine.

It isn't about waiting for the storm to pass...
It's about learning to dance in the rain.

9 years at or under goal weight! Working Maintenance Everyday
Mel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2006, 02:26 PM   #8
Constant Vigilance
 
BlueToBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Fremont, CA
Posts: 2,818

S/C/G: 150/132/<130

Height: just under 5'4"

Default

One advantage to starting at a higher caloric intake is that if you start to plateau at some point, you have some room to adjust your calories downward. If you start at your lowest possible calorie intake, the only thing you can do when you plateau is increase your exercise.

I started at 1200 calories per day and increased it to 1300 after a couple of months because I thought that with all the exercise I was doing I could eat another 100 calories. I lost about a pound per week pretty steadily on this diet for a while, but now that I'm down to the last ten pounds, my weight loss has slowed considerably. If I were at a higher calorie level, I could just drop my calories down some more.

- Barbara
BlueToBlue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2006, 02:29 PM   #9
Member
 
hart104's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago Suburbs, Illinois
Posts: 30

S/C/G: 224/144/140

Default

lipidful - Hi - congratulations. I am wondering what your activity level is and/or how often you workout or weight train. Our stats seem very much the same and I have been feeling so weak and tired on my low cal days, so I am wondering if perhaps I should increase my calories for a while.

Thanks
__________________
hart104 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2006, 02:32 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 6,182

S/C/G: 200/Ethan born 1-11-13/130

Default

I've done both methods. Radical calorie restriction always led to 1 of 2 things:

1. I restricted so much, my body binged in a desperate attempt to get the nutrients it needed.
2. I would reach a goal weight and would "quit" because there was no way I could sustain that kind of deprivation and I was looking forward to eating what I wanted again.

Every time I lost weight by radically resisting calories, I always gained the weight back and I ALWAYS gained MORE weight. Dieting made me fat.

This is the only time I've actually lost weight and kept it off longer than a couple of months. I can clearly remember another time when I was at my goal weight for only a week before the weight started coming back on.

I was more focused on nutrition and long term health this time - I needed to eat enough calories in order to give my body the wide range of nutritional benefits it needs. I would find it nearly impossible to fit in 5+ servings of vegetables, 2+ servings of fruit, low fat dairy (try to get at least 1 yogurt a day), around 40-50 grams of healthy fat, lean protein at every meal, and whole grains eating only 1200 calories a day.

I said this in another thread, for most of my life, I couldn't see the forest for the trees. The forest was long term health and the trees were losing weight. I was so focused on losing weight that I didn't care what I was doing to my long term health, nothing mattered but getting the weight off - not starving myself, not being hungry and light headed, not eating crappy processed diet foods, the ends justified the means. Now I realize that if I focus on being healthy, the weight loss happens right along with it. I can be slender AND be healthy.

I did plateau for a very long time. I lost 50 lbs fairly quickly (in about 7 months), it took me an additional 9 months to lose the last 15 lbs. It was definitely worth it and I'm glad I stuck to it and never gave up.

Gaining weight back is heartbreaking. Not being able to fit into cute new clothes I just bought, seeing sympathetic looks from friends/family, feeling like a failure. I never, ever want that again. The odds of keeping the weight off are terrible, I want to beat those odds.
__________________
SIX YEARS at maintenance weight!

My very long weight loss story

"I saw an angel in the marble and I chiseled until I set it free."
Michelangelo
Glory87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2006, 02:42 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 246

Default

Hart104-
Actually, I'm a little ashamed to admit that my activity level has been pretty low. I was exercising regularly for a while (maybe 4 times a week for 1/2 hour or so walking briskly or running on trampoline) and I got lazy and can't seem to get back into it. I think I must have a good metabolism-I never yo yo dieted. I only lost any significant amount once in my life and gained it back gradually. Other than that, any weight changes up or down were gradual. Plus, I think I'm young (Is 33 young? LOL) and I have a lot of natural musculature.
I hope I don't get too overconfident, though.
lipidful is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2006, 02:46 PM   #12
Meg
Senior Member
 
Meg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Posts: 9,160

S/C/G: 257/135/maintaining

Height: 5' 4"

Default

I lost 122 pounds in about 50 weeks, which works out to about 2.5 pounds/week. I started at 1600 calories, dropped whenever my weight loss stalled, and ended up around 1200 calories. Never cheated. Hour of cardio every day, weights five days/week. I'm sure a lot of people might think that was 'fast' but it was really only as fast as my body wanted to let the fat go.

My story is a lot like Mel's ... I changed EVERYTHING overnight. I've said before that it was like dying and being reborn. Maybe I had to do it that way since I was 46 and had failed at diets for my whole life? I don't think babysteps would have worked for me; like Mel, I needed to get rid of all my old bad habits and see results. Or I would have quit for the thousandth time.

If I was to go back in time, I wouldn't change a thing. I'd do it exactly the same way. After all, the way I lost weight is the same way that I've maintained my loss and it's been four years of maintenance for me now.

Honestly, I don't think there's one best answer. In the end, it's all about perserverance.
__________________
Meg
Start: 257 - June 1, 2001
Goal: 135 - May 12, 2002
Size 22/size 4
Meg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2006, 03:43 PM   #13
Lovin' Life
 
Puney's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Great Smoky Mountains, TN
Posts: 24

S/C/G: 198/190/135~5'3"

Default

A wise friend told me to only do what I would be willing to do for the rest of my life. I have done both approaches withdifferent diets over the years. In the end I always end up going off "the plan" and going back to my bad habits. I am now trying new habits that I like and am willing to adopt forever. I am also dropping weight and I am happy too. I don't feel like I am waiting for something to be over. I feel like I am beginning the rest of my life. It is really encouraging and If it takes me 5 years that's okay. I would prefer faster but I know the heartbreak of gaining it all back time and time again.

I am borrowing ideas from all kinds of diet plans but basics are the easiest. I allow for slip ups and I don't beat myself over the head about it because there will always be a slip up. I just deal with it with more exercise and better eating.

Good luck in finding what suits you. I look at it like trying on shoes. Everyone wears a different size and not all of us like the same style. Keep shopping until you find what suits your taste.
Puney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2006, 03:52 PM   #14
The Beauty of Balance
 
Jayde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: W of the Atlantic
Posts: 1,047

S/C/G: 213/193~196/<195

Height: 5'7"

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Puney
I am now trying new habits that I like and am willing to adopt forever. I am also dropping weight and I am happy too. I don't feel like I am waiting for something to be over. I feel like I am beginning the rest of my life.
"I don't feel like I am waiting for something to be over."

What a healthy statement!
__________________
August DAILY goals Total points 3.5/24
30 min yoga or pilates or ball
30 min of rigorous cardio interval training
30 min of flex time: cardio or weight training or intensive functional exercise

I didn't lose weight. I burned up stored calories.
Jayde is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2006, 03:57 PM   #15
Member
 
hart104's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago Suburbs, Illinois
Posts: 30

S/C/G: 224/144/140

Default

Yeah, I wish lipidful!!! Although we seem a lot alike, I think our metabolisms are complete different!

I think subconsciously I am always looking for the easy way out.

Thanks for sharing though.
__________________
hart104 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Posts by members, moderators and admins are not considered medical advice
and no guarantee is made against accuracy.


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:22 PM.






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2