3 Fat Chicks on a Diet Weight Loss Community  

Go Back   3 Fat Chicks on a Diet Weight Loss Community > Support Forum > Weight Loss Support

Weight Loss Support Give and get support here!

Waist to Hip ratio

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-03-2006, 11:03 AM   #1
aka Superwoman!
 
2frustrated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Finchley, London, UK
Posts: 6,461

S/C/G: SW:226/16st - about 50lbs lost

Height: 5'8"

Default Waist to Hip ratio

Anyone else find this pure bunkum?

My waist to hip ratio used to be about 0.7 (divide waist measurement by hip measurement), now after I've LOST weight and toned up it's 0.81 which is ABOVE the recommended ratio, so I'm "apparently" more at risk of having a heart attack now than I was when I weighed 200lbs.



Ok and I know that it's all just "guidelines" and the such like but REALLY!
__________________
Just. One.. More... Rep.... space Eat rubbish, FEEL rubbish!
BLOG
MARATHON BLOG

Tune In Eat When You're Hungry Eat Whatever You Want Sit Down, Put It On A Plate And Focus Enjoy! Stop When You're Satisfied
Own Your Body Move Support Yourself Be Your Own Guru


The perfect weight for your body is the weight which it settles at naturally when you are eating a balanced diet and exercising moderately
2frustrated is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2006, 11:26 AM   #2
Mel
Senior Member
 
Mel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 6,963

Default

I have exactly the same experience. At my fattest, my waist to hip ratio was "acceptable" because I had a fat ***. At my absolute leanest, I have hardly any waist, an no fat on the ***! I think this only works if you have a fairly long torso and wide hips. Shortwaisted or narrow-hipped women just don't fit the mold. I doubt that I was more susceptible to heart attack with a BMI of 21 and a body fat percentage of 14!

Mel
__________________
Falling down is not failure....Failure is staying down.
Save the Earth, it's the only planet with chocolate and wine.

It isn't about waiting for the storm to pass...
It's about learning to dance in the rain.

9 years at or under goal weight! Working Maintenance Everyday
Mel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2006, 11:34 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
kykaree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lancashire, England
Posts: 3,171

Default

Right with you frus and Mel. Bunkum, when I was 262lbs my waist hip ratio was in the normal guidelines, coz I have the world's (well had) biggest hips and bum and a defined waist!

I love "guidelines" a never ending source of amusement
__________________
kykaree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2006, 01:58 PM   #4
ButDoesntWannaLookLikeOne
 
LovesBassets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 779

S/C/G: 230/218/170

Height: 5'4"

Default

Hi chickies (I missed you over the holidays! Well, I didn't miss Ky cuz I was VERY near to her, and I didn't miss 2Frus cuz I must've flown over her house Monday!! But I DID miss you, MEL!)

So you've inspired me to check out my ratio. At 189 lbs, my ratio was .82. At fifty pounds lighter, it's .81 VERY useful guideline!

Guess I just sorta shrunk all around, huh?

And because my math skills suck, does that mean I have a "big" waist or "big" hips? Or both? I'm guessin' hips, but I can't translate the math into English .
__________________

First Goal: 200 lbs by Namibia trip (May 26, 2013).

Last edited by LovesBassets : 01-03-2006 at 02:03 PM.
LovesBassets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2006, 02:42 PM   #5
geeky pagan chick
 
Tani's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Western Washington
Posts: 882

S/C/G: 265/136/150

Default

Kate, you're right on the edge of the supposed ideal ratio (.8 or less) I think that puts you just on the edge of hippy-ness.

The only thing this calculation shows is whether you're more pear shaped or apple shaped (Something most of us are already aware of!) Apple shape is supposed to correlate to a higher incidence of heart trouble, but it's only one of many many risk factors.

I think most people's ratios stay remarkably similar as they lose or gain weight, so it's kind of a weird thing to focus on. It's not like you can change where you store extra weight. At 265 my ratio was .62 and at 139 it's .68 which puts me squarely in the pear camp. (Like I didn't know that already!)
__________________
HW:265
Original Goal:150 met 9/05
Currently maintaining 135-140

before and after
Tani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2006, 02:47 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington Heights, NYC
Posts: 506

Default

I think it works pretty well for men, but we are naturally "apple shaped" when overweight.

Doesn't the "apple" shape in women correlate with smaller ratio of estrogen:testosterone which in turn correlates with a greater risk of heart attack and stroke?
__________________
RobertW is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Posts by members, moderators and admins are not considered medical advice
and no guarantee is made against accuracy.


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:01 PM.






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2