Eating Times - Just a curious question - 3 Fat Chicks on a Diet Weight Loss Community

Onederchic · 08-10-2009, 02:27 PM

I was having a discussion about this earlier with someone and would like any input from others so here goes -

Say you are alotting yourself 1500 calories a day. Say you decide to eat all those calories in 2 meals. Will that affect your weight loss any different than if you are to spread it over the course of the entire day?

time2lose · 08-10-2009, 02:32 PM

I don't know about how it would affect weight loss. I do know that I have tried that and ended up getting light headed. I think having just 2 meals caused my blood sugar to go low and then spike high. My hunger was also more difficult to control.

Eating at regular intervals works well for me.

Just my 2 cents worth.

david · 08-10-2009, 02:36 PM

one, thats kind of how i eat...i dont even feel hungry til about 2 pm...then again at about 7 pm...i eat at 2pm and 8 pm so from 7 to 8 i get pretty hungry but its only a short time...this works for me...i really believe its calories in vs calories burned

RealCdn · 08-10-2009, 02:38 PM

In theory it's not likely going to make a difference. As much as I like the idea (2 big meals) I wouldn't likely be able to stop myself from eating at other times. Having said that, I know a couple of people who have had success with a form of 'Eat Stop Eat' or who literally eat all their calories within a short window period.

For most people, without any medical complications, I believe it's really just a case of calories in vs. calories burned.

mandalinn82 · 08-10-2009, 02:40 PM

Not if the calories are the same.

However, I personally find that eating that way makes me hungrier and tends to cause me to make bad choices, or eat unhealthy things because I "had the calories" for it. I went through a period in my early 20's where I'd basically starve myself all day, then eat Taco Bell at night because it was within my calories...not a healthy way of eating for sure!

kiramira · 08-10-2009, 02:43 PM

SO many theories about this -- one is that if you have alot of small meals you keep your "metabolism" going because you are digesting. However, if you have a meal, then exercise, blood will be diverted from digestion to your muscles, so you haven't really 'revved" anything up. Another other theory is that if you eat two meals, the excess calories not needed at that time will "turn to fat" as they will be stored, making you fat. However, when you need the calories, your body will get them from that stored energy in any event...

My personal view is that you can find research on both sides of the issue. The ONLY thing that is important is that you decide what will work for YOU and stick with it. For some, constant grazing is the way to go. For others, 3 meals a day. For me, I often have 2 meals a day because of when I exercise (I'll have a banana 3 hours before yoga, so that's my meal for that time of day)...I haven't had any bad side effects, but if I was super hungry in the off-eating hours then clearly this wouldn't work for me and I'd spread out my meals more evenly...

Clear as mud, huh...

Kira

jamiewyn · 08-10-2009, 02:46 PM

I don't know what SCIENCE has to say on the matter. In my experience, weeks where I have been careful to spread my calories out throughout the day are the weeks that I see a solid loss.

If I eat all my calories, say, between 1pm to 8pm, I still lose, but it's not as big of a loss.

I think you just have to figure out how your body responds to each method.

Onederchic · 08-10-2009, 02:48 PM

For me, I have to spread it over the whole day or I end up binging. The person I was talking with said it wouldn't make a difference weight loss-wise as long as you were staying in your caloric intake amount for the day - if you ate it in 6 meals or even just one. I couldn't try it like that as I would end up back at 330 pounds and we can't have that, can we?

I always love getting the different opinions and feedback on this forum so lemme say thanks to all ya'll

kiramira · 08-10-2009, 02:51 PM

Kira

Onederchic · 08-10-2009, 02:55 PM

Aww Kira huggies for me

ImpalaHoarder · 08-10-2009, 03:10 PM

My concern would be that my metabolism would slow down from not eating frequently. I know that if I don't eat by 4 pm say, I feel horrible and foggy and tired, and I presume that's because I'm using less energy. I don't really know, though. The times I've lost weight I was eating a really small amount three meals a day, but I don't know whether it would have gone better or I could have eaten more if I'd spread it out more.

beerab · 08-10-2009, 03:42 PM

Having PCOS I am very sure my doctor would kill me if I tried to do that. It's very crucial I eat every so often to keep my blood sugar stable.

My day is normally:

Up at 6, arrive at work at 7, breakfast between 7:30 and 8 am, lunch at 11:30, snack at 2:30, dinner at 5:30, snack at 7:30-8 pm. Bed at 10:30-11 pm.

I find this totally helps me during the day to eat every 3-4 hours

I used to eat 1-2 large meals a day- YEAH didn't work...

iaradajnos · 08-10-2009, 07:10 PM

I eat 1350 calories per day and exercise frequently. I have been following the advise of Barbara Rolls' book about Volumetrics. I eat four times a day and keep that basically regular: 4:30am wake, 5:15am workout, 6:45am eat (meal 1), 10-10:45am eat (meal 2), 2-2:45pm (meal 3), and 6-6:45pm eat (meal 4).

Lessons Learned:
1) I pace myself with 300-325 calorie meals
2) I keep my hunger, blood surger, etc. balanced and minimal
(if I'm hungry, I look at the clock now and find that "makes sense, it's been about 3-4 hours and time to eat)
3) I've taught myself small portions (my hugest problem since my personal problem has always been appropriate portions)

So, I would recommend eating several times a day. When I begin my maintenance phase, I will only add 50 calories to each meal (i.e., 200 calories per day). If I can add more calories without gaining weight, I'll add a small snack (thus four meals plus a snack evenly paced).

dragonwoman64 · 08-10-2009, 07:21 PM

I had the thought that each meal would be about 750 calories, which is a fairly big meal (I supposed depending on what you're choosing to eat).

Eating smaller meals and snacks for me has led me redefine the size of my meals, and to feeling full on smaller meals. I think choosing 2 larger meals would lead me to eating more eventually because I'd go back to considering larger sized meals as a "norm" (I don't think it would be easy for me to eat 2 meals a day, and would go back to 3 meals at some point).

I could see that making my blood sugar spike and dive too, and I'd probably end up reaching for even more food because of the dives.

jamiewyn · 08-10-2009, 08:45 PM

I've been thinking about this some more. I didn't eat breakfast or lunch for years. (like a decade). I only ate dinner and evening snacks. I was not eating a 2000 calorie dinner, let me assure you. My favorite evening snacks were popcorn and grapes (still are

) I wasn't counting calories, but I wasn't eating triple portions, either.

I went from 145 to 227 eating this way. I think eating all of my calories w/in a handful of hours definitely contributed to the ballooning of my weight. Funny, as I was thinking today about this thread, I realized something. When I would visit my parents (out of state), I usually DROPPED a few pounds. I would always join them for each of their meals. Guess I should have recognized this trend earlier!

As I said before, I don't have any science to back this up, but from my experience, spreading the calories throughout the day seems to be the way MY body works best.