Weight Loss Support Give and get support here!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-12-2007, 11:57 AM   #1  
Wastin' Away Again!
Thread Starter
 
Beach Patrol's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: on the beach
Posts: 2,313

S/C/G: 192/170/130

Height: 5'3" 50 years old

Default More Duh

This is just WEIRD to me.

My FitDay today - (after I have lunch & afternoon snack) has a total of:

Calories = 1100
Fat = 41g
Carb = 113g
Protein = 69g

But on the "percentage wheel" it looks like this:
Fat 36%
Carb 38%
Protein 27%

I just DON'T get the math here!!!! I thought I was doing well to have 69g of protein & only 41g of fat. But percentage wise, Fat 36 & Protein 27... how can it be so much less???

And because I'm so utterly confused with the math proportions, I'm thinking I shouldn't be doing a "mathmetically directed" diet.

Some days are just MORE DUH than others, I guess.
Beach Patrol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2007, 12:34 PM   #2  
Low Carb Lolita
 
Azure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 855

S/C/G: 185/see ticker/135

Height: 5'7"

Default

I think it's because you're forgetting that while protein and carbs have 4 calories per gram, Fat has 9 calories per gram.

So of your 1100 calories:

-(41g x 9 cal) 369 calories are from Fat (34%)
-(113g x 4 cal) 452 calories are from Carbs (41%)
-(69g x 4 cal) 276 are from Protein (25%)

At least, that's what my math comes up with. It's a little different from your FitDay %, but not by too much The difference in percentage on Fit Day (compared to my percentages) could be explained by fiber. Of your carbs, the fiber wouldn't have 4 cal/gram because it's indigestible. Fit Day will list the "total" carbs, but it likely takes fiber into account and doesn't count the fiber toward your calories or percentage, which would account for the slight shift from the percentages I came up with (meaning that where I found 41% carbs, FitDay lists it as less--38% because of your fiber. When that % goes down, the other two values for Fat/Protein go up) I hope that made sense...

Last edited by Azure; 11-12-2007 at 01:56 PM.
Azure is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2007, 01:52 PM   #3  
Just Yr Everyday Chick
 
JayEll's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,852

S/C/G: Lost 50 lbs, regained some

Height: 5'3"

Default

Yes, what Azure said! Fat is just a really energy-rich food, which is why it's so easy to go over on calories when eating something like butter or full-fat salad dressing. Those things have to be carefully measured.

Jay
JayEll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2007, 04:06 PM   #4  
Wastin' Away Again!
Thread Starter
 
Beach Patrol's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: on the beach
Posts: 2,313

S/C/G: 192/170/130

Height: 5'3" 50 years old

Default

But.... isn't it.... regardless of what you eat (fat, protein, carbs, etc.)... It's the TOTAL CALORIES that depict weight loss....? All my life I've understood that your intake & output of TOTAL CALORIES is what weight loss (or gain) is all about.

Therefore, if I'm eating 1800 (give or take) calories per day, & I want to lose 1-2 pounds per week, I should drop 300-500 PER DAY. Regardless of WHERE those calories come from.

Right? (and why am I suddenly getting so many brain farts in this area????)
Beach Patrol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2007, 05:23 PM   #5  
Just Yr Everyday Chick
 
JayEll's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,852

S/C/G: Lost 50 lbs, regained some

Height: 5'3"

Default

Well gosh, yes, if we want to go by the laws of physics, it's total calories. But it's pretty obvious that if you ate 1800 calories of butter, it would not be the same as eating 1800 calories of whole wheat bread. Nutrition is more complicated than the laws of physics.

Different types of programs use different percentages for protein/fat/carb. I've been using what I think are the Zone percentages--or I try, anyway--which is 30/30/40.

Does that make it any clearer?

Jay
JayEll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2007, 05:39 PM   #6  
Low Carb Lolita
 
Azure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 855

S/C/G: 185/see ticker/135

Height: 5'7"

Default

It is definitely the total number of calories that matter in the end, but in my opinion, it's what makes you feel/function the best as far as macronutrients.

1500 calories of doughnuts probably isn't going to make you feel satisfied for the whole day, and after a few days of 1500 calories of doughnuts you're probably going to feel run-down and starved. Could you lose weight eating 1500 calories of doughnuts a day? Yes. But you probably will feel like crap if you do it that way That's where the macronutrients come in: where do you put them so that you feel satisfied all day long and have energy?

For me, I'm on a very low carb diet (a ketogenic diet) and my macros are more like 6% carbs / 44% protein/ 50% fat on a daily basis. Those ratios keep me feeling full all day on 1500 calories/day. Other people have a lot of success with other ratios...it really depends on how your body handles different foods.

But in the end, whether I'm eating 6% carb/44% protein/50% fat ratio on 1500 calories a day or 60% carb/ 25% protein/15% fat ratio on 1500 calories a day, I'm still in the same caloric deficit and I'll drop the same amount of weight per week (technically). But for me, if I ate 60% carbs a day I'd be miserable and STARVING on 1500 a day, whereas I'm completely satisfied on 6% (all coming from vegetables) with the rest being protein and fat for that many calories.

I don't mean to be confusing...I hope it helps? The macronutrient breakdown is really individual, it's the calorie deficit that ultimately matters.

Last edited by Azure; 11-12-2007 at 05:40 PM.
Azure is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:54 AM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.