3 Fat Chicks on a Diet Weight Loss Community  

Go Back   3 Fat Chicks on a Diet Weight Loss Community > Diet Central > Weight Loss News and Current Events

Weight Loss News and Current Events Discuss the latest weight loss news headlines and major events.

Interesting Article about Low Carb vs. Other Plans

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-27-2012, 08:12 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
lin43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,654

Default Interesting Article about Low Carb vs. Other Plans

http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/...oss/55843134/1

I am not on a low carb plan, but I've toyed with the idea of making more of my meals lc and/or reducing my carbs a bit. It seems like more and more evidence points to the benefits. (But I could never go mainly lc----love them too much).
__________________
Clothes Sizes (not lbs):
lin43 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2012, 09:39 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
hatgirlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 264

Default

Interesting! I do the low carb...my sis does the low glycemic. Always works for me as long as I stay with it. It's working for her, too. I could never do the low fat. Thanks for posting the article.
hatgirlie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2012, 11:27 PM   #3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 24

Default

great article, thanks for posting.

found this line to be helpful:

"you can do well on any diet as long as you stick to it. Adherence is the major key for weight loss and maintenance"
NateC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2012, 02:25 AM   #4
Leveling Up
 
sontaikle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: New York
Posts: 3,655

S/C/G: 200+/115/115

Height: 5'3"

Default

My diet is probably one of the lower carb ones they're talking about—close to a Mediterranean diet actually if I ate more fish. I can't go super low carb though. Haha it's funny that that works for me though, most of my ancestry is Mediterranean (Italian, Sicilian and Spanish), maybe that's why?

I've actually been doing some research into the specific needs for women though, because a lot of these nutrition sites and studies throw men and women into the same mix. The diets are designed for men and women are tacked on as an afterthought (which I wouldn't be surprised if that happened here in this study). As far as I'm concerned we have different needs than men and I feel that the medical profession—and most certainly the diet industry—neglects that.

I've only done a little bit of research, but I've found some evidence from women-specific sites that suggests that we need carbs and shouldn't go down into that super low carb range (i.e. less than 50g) but should rather stay within a mid-carb range—100-150g or perhaps even 200g—to ensure our bodies function properly. I find this to be true regarding my own body; I function best at that 100-150g range (and for those wanting to avoid grains, this can certainly be done without eating grains).

There was also evidence to suggest that IF doesn't work for women (in that we were accustomed to eating throughout the day). Now I've seen a lot of women here do fine on IF, so I'm skeptical, but it was interesting because I'm one of those who prefers to eat throughout the day rather than have fewer large meals.

Last edited by sontaikle : 06-28-2012 at 03:12 AM.
sontaikle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2012, 11:37 AM   #5
Member
 
coffeebrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 36

Default

I totally agree with sontaike. I'm keeping my carbs down too, but I don't count carb grams. I avoid most grains because I have gluten intolerance, but I eat a lot of beans, fruit, veg, including starchy veg, and a limited amount of gluten free grains when I want them.

The bottom line for me is calories, but I feel healthier eating a lot of protein, within my calorie range.

I tried low carb diets. I tried them for the longest time, but bottom line was I just ate too much even though my carbs were kept super low. It's quite easy to OD on proteins and fats if you eat too many of their calories, and that's what I did. I NEVER lost weight and even gained a little.

So low carbing alone never worked for me.
coffeebrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2012, 10:55 AM   #6
Larry's Angel
 
JerseyGyrl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NW New Jersey But, My Heart's In Pittsburgh!! GO STEELERS & PENGUINS!!!
Posts: 3,051

S/C/G: 245/143/145

Default

I'm a long term low carber. I've been on Atkins slightly over 8 years now. I do not eat bread, potatoes, rice, pasta. I eat lots of veggies (non-starchy) & salads and minimal protein. It works for me but, that being said, everyone is different.
__________________
Start Each Day With A Grateful Heart






Still Going Strong On Atkins Since April 13, 2004


Before & After Pics: http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a2.../Kimatlake.jpg
http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a2...1/IMG_0403.jpg
JerseyGyrl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2012, 12:19 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
kaplods's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Wausau, WI
Posts: 13,378

S/C/G: SW:394/310/180

Height: 5'6"

Default

I find it very interesting that the study found a 300 calorie difference, because (as I've said here on 3FC several times) by tracking my calories and experiments with carb-levels in my food journal, I've found that I lose about as well on 1500 calories of high-carb as on 1800 calories of low-carb.

Several folks have argued that my experience had to be uncommon, and I accepted that they were probably correct. Looks like my experience may be more common than I thought (or this study just happened to assign freaks like me to the low-carb diet group).

I also used to believe that I couldn't ever do low-carb or carb-restricted for the long term, because I loved carbs too much. After 41 years of dieting and failing, and learning that only carb-restriction works for me in the long run, I have to learn to give up what I love (or at least eat them very, very rarely - and always look at them as the exception rather than the rule).

I've come to realize that carb-dense foods, especially the high glycemic ones are addictive to me. Whenever I tell myself I can't give them up because I love them too much - I ask myself whether I would say the same of alcohol or heroine, or even my prescription pain meds (which I use, but don't "love").

I use my pain meds because they currently provide more benefits than negative consequences. However, if I ever felt that I was using my pain meds because I loved them too much to give them up, I'd remind myself that my love has nothing to do with whether pain meds should or shouldn't be in my life. The only thing that should matter is whether the pain meds were contributing more to my life than they were taking away.

So I look at carbs the same way. My love of them doesn't matter. What matters is the bottom line of quality of life. If carbs are taking more from my life than they are giving, then I have to give them up (or accept that I'm losing more than I'm benefiting).

I'm not carb-free, and may never be, but I do have much higher standards for my food than I used to. Whenever I want to eat some high-carb food, I try to be sure that the food is going to give me more than it takes away - and for most high-carb foods, the cons outweigh the pros. I still may choose to eat the food anyway, but it's because I've decided that the psychological benefit outweighs the physiological con. However, when I have decided that, I've often been wrong.

I wouldn't be surprised to find out that I have to give up more carbs than I have already, but I try to remember that "love" really can't have much to do with the decision (unless it's loving myself enough to value myself more than sugar).
__________________
My Etsy shop (currently closed for the summer)

http://www.dreamstormdesigns.etsy.com
etsy link by permission from 3fc! Want to add yours? Ask them!
kaplods is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2012, 08:50 AM   #8
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 84

Default

I've tried super low carb time and time again, and even at 20 or 40 grams of carbs a day, I become ridiculously tired and cranky. Going up to 80g, it was like night and day. It's unfortunate, since lower carb does seem to help weight loss, but what can ya do?
stunzorz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2012, 05:02 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
lin43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,654

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kaplods View Post
I find it very interesting that the study found a 300 calorie difference, because (as I've said here on 3FC several times) by tracking my calories and experiments with carb-levels in my food journal, I've found that I lose about as well on 1500 calories of high-carb as on 1800 calories of low-carb.
Kaplods, I thought of you when I read that article and was hoping you would pop in to comment on it. I also remember you writing that your body temperature was actually a bit higher on your reduced carb plan. That makes sense in terms of the study and its findings on increased metabolism.
__________________
Clothes Sizes (not lbs):
lin43 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2012, 08:30 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
kaplods's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Wausau, WI
Posts: 13,378

S/C/G: SW:394/310/180

Height: 5'6"

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stunzorz View Post
I've tried super low carb time and time again, and even at 20 or 40 grams of carbs a day, I become ridiculously tired and cranky. Going up to 80g, it was like night and day. It's unfortunate, since lower carb does seem to help weight loss, but what can ya do?
At 80g per day, you are benefiting from the advantages of low-carb. I'm not sure why, but it's a common myth in our culture that for low-carb to work or have any advantage at all, it must be a super low, virtuallly no-carb diet to be effective.

Some of the experts in the field of dietetics for weight loss, diabetes, and other metabolic issues that benefit from carb-restriction consider any plan that contains fewer than 200g of carbs, or any diet containing less than 70% of total calories coming from carbs as a reduced or low carb diet.

Others choose 150g or 100g, or 60% of 50% calories for the cut-off.

It all proves that low-carb is in the eye of the beholder, and is all dependent upon what you're used to.

I consider my exchange plan a low-carb exchange plan, even though I average about 100g to 150g of carb per day. Right now, most people don't consider that low-carb, but it's about 1/3 of the national average (if I'm remembering the statistics right).

If your income were 1/3 the national average, you'd consider yourself lower income, and I think 2/3 of people eating more carbs than you also makes your diet low carb.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lin43 View Post
Kaplods, I thought of you when I read that article and was hoping you would pop in to comment on it. I also remember you writing that your body temperature was actually a bit higher on your reduced carb plan. That makes sense in terms of the study and its findings on increased metabolism.

Yep, my body temp is about a full degree (sometimes a little more, sometimes a little less) higher on low-carb. My normal high-carb temperature is around 97.4 give or take .2 degrees. My normal low-carb temperature is between 98.0 and 98.6 depending on how low-carb I'm eating.

On high-carb I also feel incredibly lethargic, and have a lot more pain, fatigue, mobility issues and other health problems.

On low (but not too low) I feel much better and have the energy to do more. Too low and I do end up getting unpleasant symptoms.

If I could go lower, I would lose faster, but faster isn't always better (despite what popular magazine covers would lead us to believe).
__________________
My Etsy shop (currently closed for the summer)

http://www.dreamstormdesigns.etsy.com
etsy link by permission from 3fc! Want to add yours? Ask them!
kaplods is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2012, 10:39 AM   #11
One day at a time!
 
time2lose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The deep south
Posts: 4,349

S/C/G: 301/see ticker/160

Height: 5' 2"

Default

This is such an interesting discussion. I lost 100 pounds and then gained 40 back. I have really struggled getting back on track because of cravings. I knew that I needed to lower my carbs to get control of the cravings. I found trying to determine how many grams of carbs to shoot for very difficult. I decided to eat within my calorie limit (1200 - 1400 range), track my carbs and adjust according to my cravings.

My average carb consumption for the past two weeks has been 150 grams and is always less than 50% of my caloric intake. My cravings have pretty much disappeared (Whew.......). I have lost 3 pounds in the last two weeks. I know that does not sound like much for some of you but that is a huge loss for me. Also, I have been feeling well.

The failing perfectionist in me has said, "150 grams is not low carb!" I so appreciated Kaplods posting about various carb levels. I have told myself the 150 g is reduced carb compared to the amount of carbs that I had been consuming.

Of course, now I am consuming much more protein than the "recommended" amount but I don't know any other way to reduce my carbs. I think that I am going stay on my current carb level for another week to see if my trend continues. Then I may experiment with dropping my carb level another 25 g or so to see what happens.

Thank you for all the posts on this thread!
__________________
Cheryl



Persistence is more important than Perfection

Continuous effort - not strength or intelligence - is the key to unlocking our potential. - Winston Churchill

Last edited by time2lose : 07-02-2012 at 10:39 AM.
time2lose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2012, 11:07 AM   #12
Member
 
Laurlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 69

S/C/G: 270/see ticker/130

Height: 5'4"

Default

I routinely eat more protein than "recommended". I just love protein, period. I hate that government agencies still push a diet that is killing our nation!
Laurlie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2012, 03:57 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 146

Default

It's too hard for me to do super low carb. I'm just not a fan of eating spinach all the time. I try to limit my carb intake to 80g a day. I usually go higher, but usually never past 100g. Basically how I see it is if I have that croissant I really want for breakfast, then later in the day I should have a salad for a side instead of rice or potatoes. It has allowed me to eat the things that I want, but I have to be more choosy.
__________________


Euphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2012, 05:39 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
rubidoux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 482

S/C/G: 214/ticker/130

Height: 5'1.5"

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stunzorz View Post
I've tried super low carb time and time again, and even at 20 or 40 grams of carbs a day, I become ridiculously tired and cranky. Going up to 80g, it was like night and day. It's unfortunate, since lower carb does seem to help weight loss, but what can ya do?
For some people, 20 g of carb is still too much. For me, it is way too much. I'm doing great now on about 7 g carb a day and 55-70 grams of protein (usually it's about 60). Everything else I eat is fat, so that leaves me with probably around 80% fat, but I haven't tracked my calories or measured/counted how much fat I'm eating. I don't care as long as I'm actively losing and all of the fats I'm eating are good fats.

Anyway... I feel much better eating this way than I do at higher carb levels and I am losing. I'm not suggesting that you should try it, but an alternative to eating more carb is eating less.
__________________




type I diabetic and mama to ds1 (9/14/03) and ds2 (2/11/09)
sometimes vlc, sometimes pure carnivore, always once-a-day feeding
rubidoux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2012, 05:58 PM   #15
Low Carb
 
1spunkygal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: VA (heart in Illinois)
Posts: 342

S/C/G: 225/ ticker /135

Height: 5' 2"

Default

Thanks for this article lower carb works for me. I'm not perfect @ it but that's how I've lost most of my weight.
__________________




As long as I'm lower than the week before that's all that matters to me.
1spunkygal is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Posts by members, moderators and admins are not considered medical advice
and no guarantee is made against accuracy.


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:18 PM.






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2