3 Fat Chicks on a Diet Weight Loss Community  

Go Back   3 Fat Chicks on a Diet Weight Loss Community > Diet Central > Weight Loss News and Current Events

Weight Loss News and Current Events Discuss the latest weight loss news headlines and major events.

Faster Weight Loss = Better Results - Study

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-22-2010, 12:47 AM   #1
Good things happen.
 
Serendipity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 96

Height: 5' 4"

Default Faster Weight Loss = Better Results - Study

"People who lose greater amounts of weight initially in weight-loss attempts may experience better weight loss and maintenance results than those who lose weight gradually, according to research published in the June issue of the International Journal of Behavioral Medicine." Faster Weight Loss Appears to Yield Better Results


The blurb on allnurses.com also has links to the abstract and original article. I know that we often hear people say that if you lose the weight slowly, you're more likely to keep it off. This study seems to contradict that. In the end, I think it truly is an individual mindset -- whether you lose weight slowly or quickly, you'll keep it off if you commit to maintaining your diet and exercise at a level that allows you to live without feeling like you're sacrificing to stay thin. But that's just my opinion, and you know what they say about opinions!
__________________
Serendipity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2010, 01:05 AM   #2
live ur life
 
caliyah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 405

S/C/G: 236/193/150

Height: 5'8

Default

definitely! it all comes down 2 maintenance. i can always lose the weight but i can never maintain so i am now focusing on making sure when i get to goal finally to not fall back into old habits
__________________
Losetogain: If you don't quit, you can't fail.
Rocky Balboa: You, me, or nobody is gonna hit as hard as life. But it ain't how hard you hit; it's about how hard you can get hit, and keep moving forward. How much you can take, and keep moving forward. That's how winning is done.
caliyah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2010, 07:05 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
yoyoma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: New England
Posts: 1,694

S/C/G: 180/ticker/139

Height: 5'6.5"

Default

I beg to differ with their apparent definition of "long term" (18 months). I think their study design and interpretation are both off. The article states that none of the groups showed significant weight regain at 18 months. That in itself should indicate to the investigators that they have not yet gotten to the heart of the problem of maintenance.
__________________
Hoping to earn the user name NoYoyoMa...


yoyoma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2010, 09:10 AM   #4
To Maintenance-AND BEYOND
 
Eumie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 316

S/C/G: 252/ticker/189

Height: 5'2"

Default

I've always thought that gradual weight loss was better for maintenance. And of course the fast group was more likely to have lost more weight at 18 months. That's what put them in the fast group to begin with. AND, they said there was no significant regain in any of the groups. They're reading the data in a twisty-logic kind of way, imo. Now, I only read the blurb on all nurses.
__________________
1st goal--216 (lowest weight since moving to NC): achieved 5/14/10
2nd goal--203 (lowest weight post college):
3rd goal--199 (Onederland!)
4th goal--189 (where I'd like to be before really trying to get pregnant)
5th goal--180 (100 lbs. from my highest weight ever)
6th goal--169 (overweight bmi)
7th goal--140 (normal bmi)

The Ultimate Goal...
Eumie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2010, 05:18 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
PeanutsMom704's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,020

S/C/G: 263/ticker/156

Height: 5'7"

Default

I couldn't access the entire study but from looking at the abstract, the premise seems a bit flawed. They assigned women in the fast, medium and slow categories based on how much they lost the first month of the study. So it may just be that the group who lost more quickly were just able to lose weight more rapidly for whatever reason (the same reasons that apply to many people on 3fc - some people lose 100 lbs in a matter of months, for others, it may take a few years to get there).

All the groups gained some of their initial loss back but fwiw, it was actually the moderate loss group (.5 to 1.5 lb per week) who had the highest percentage of weight loss maintenance. But I guess a headline that "moderate weight loss creates better results" isn't as catchy!
__________________
Long Term Goal

1st 10% - 2/2/10
Current Goal - 2nd 10%

PeanutsMom704 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Posts by members, moderators and admins are not considered medical advice
and no guarantee is made against accuracy.


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rate of Weight Loss Tied to Maintanence Karen925 Living Maintenance 39 12-06-2010 10:12 PM
October Weight Loss Challenge FullSteamAhead Chicks up for a Challenge 563 11-03-2009 12:51 PM
RECOMMENDED READING - Books, Articles & Links to Websites Debelli Sugar Shakers 63 08-14-2003 07:56 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:52 PM.






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2