3 Fat Chicks on a Diet Weight Loss Community  

Go Back   3 Fat Chicks on a Diet Weight Loss Community > Diet Central > General Diet Plans and Questions > LA Weight Loss

calorie negative food : a myth ?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-11-2008, 08:37 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 104

Default calorie negative food : a myth ?

Is calorie negative food simply a myth or is this true ?
kaytlin90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2008, 09:34 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
kaplods's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Wausau, WI
Posts: 13,335

S/C/G: SW:394/310/180

Height: 5'6"

Default

Yes, it pretty much is a myth. There are alot of low calorie foods, but the idea that any burn more than they contain, just isn't true.
__________________
My Etsy shop (currently closed for the summer)

http://www.dreamstormdesigns.etsy.com
etsy link by permission from 3fc! Want to add yours? Ask them!
kaplods is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2008, 09:44 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The Deep South
Posts: 4,445

S/C/G: 237/165.8/130

Height: 5'4"

Default

Total myth.

The numbers can be manipulated to make it sound true, but it's not true. Everything you eat has calories. Everything you eat requires *some* calorie expenditure to digest. If you start playing with the numbers, you can make anything look like it has less calories and even make some things sound like they're "calorie free". Don't be fooled by faux-science and faux-math.

.
PhotoChick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2008, 10:15 PM   #4
This is not a test.
 
Iconised Ghost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 3,409

S/C/G: 187/132/127.8

Height: 5'5''/165cm

Default

not even celery?
Iconised Ghost is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2008, 10:35 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
kaplods's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Wausau, WI
Posts: 13,335

S/C/G: SW:394/310/180

Height: 5'6"

Default

not even celery.

Often part of the way the "math" is deceptively worked out is using calories for the math of "burning," and counting kilocalories for the food.

See the calorie we think of is, not actually a single calorie, but rather a unit of 1000 calories or a kilocalorie. Many countries actually write "kilocalories" on the nutrition label, but in the USA (and I'm not sure if anywhere else) the label usually is labeled as "calories."

So, if you talk about small calories for burning, and large calories for eating, you can make it seem like you can actually compensate for high calorie food with negative calorie food.

There are other ways to twist the math, but this is one way.
__________________
My Etsy shop (currently closed for the summer)

http://www.dreamstormdesigns.etsy.com
etsy link by permission from 3fc! Want to add yours? Ask them!
kaplods is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2008, 10:46 PM   #6
This is not a test.
 
Iconised Ghost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 3,409

S/C/G: 187/132/127.8

Height: 5'5''/165cm

Default

aww snap, i was really hoping that one was true XD
Iconised Ghost is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2008, 11:21 PM   #7
banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: ny
Posts: 4,904

Default

although the concept is a myth--- the volumetric concept is real and proven which is how the volumetrics plan and ww core came about.
andreaphilip3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Posts by members, moderators and admins are not considered medical advice
and no guarantee is made against accuracy.


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:45 AM.






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2