General chatter Because life isn't just about dieting. Play games, jokes, or share what's new in your life!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-18-2009, 03:06 AM   #1  
Chubby Chick
Thread Starter
 
helwa588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Philly
Posts: 321

S/C/G: see ticker

Height: 5,4

Default Twiggy's Photoshopped Olay ads banned in England


Perhaps we should start calling 2009 the year of the airbrush. The latest Photoshop scandal involves not an emaciated model nor a bizarrely-retouched actress on the cover of a fashion magazine, but instead a 60-year-old icon with not enough crows' feet for anyone's liking.

Let's catch you up: Last summer, beauty company Olay debuted its Definity eye cream campaign depicting model Twiggy looking far younger, smoother, and firmer than her then 59 years should suggest. The '60s fashion star appeared virtually wrinkle-free in the ads and, since her baby-faced visage was selling anti-aging cream to older women, quite a few people—including bloggers, news outlets, and the British Parliament—grew quite disturbed.

In August, British lawmakers called for a ban on the digitally altered ads, suggesting they mislead the public. And, in the ensuing months, the U.K's Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) received hundreds of complaints from the public, claiming the Olay images were "socially irresponsible" and could have a "negative impact on people's perceptions of their own body image, " The Guardian reports.

Finally, yesterday, the ASA banned the complete set of Olay Twiggy ads, ruling that the post-production retouching could give consumers a "misleading impression of the effect the product could achieve."

You think?

In the ads, Twiggy says, "Olay is my secret to brighter-looking eyes" and "Because younger-looking eyes never go out of fashion...[it] reduces the look of wrinkles and dark circles for brighter, younger-looking eyes."

However, since Olay admits to "minor retouching" around Twiggy's eyelid area (essentially wiping out any indication of undereye darkness, bags, and fine lines), we know the cream is not really her secret. Instead it's a skilled computer technician, which is something you just can't bottle and sell for $23.89. Nor is this "secret" available to most women. Honestly, it's refreshing that, with the banning of these ads, finally someone is saying just that.

Source:
The Guardian, Cele*****y
http://shine.yahoo.com/channel/beaut...ngland-554961/

Last edited by helwa588; 12-18-2009 at 03:07 AM.
helwa588 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2009, 06:27 AM   #2  
Senior Member
 
Chelby29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Beautiful Remlap, Alabama
Posts: 1,570

S/C/G: Too much/Less/Just Right!

Height: 5'4"

Default

Have you seen the actual photo of Twiggy? She really looks great! There was no reason to airbrush her.
Chelby29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2009, 12:40 PM   #3  
Member
 
pliem2009's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 42

Default

I think that picture of her is kinda wierd...doesn't look natural (i'm not talking about the photoshoped face) but the pose and smile...I think it's the angle of the camera, if the camera is pointed at her face maybe it'll be better...

I miss twiggy on ANTM she's my favorite
pliem2009 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2009, 02:13 PM   #4  
in development
 
silverbirch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Britain
Posts: 4,755

Height: 5' 6"

Default

Odd, really, because Twigs is also in adverts for Marks and Spencer in the UK, looking pretty normal for her age (well, on the good end of normal). She was also in the press a lot when she had her 60th birthday. So most of us here have some idea of what she looks like nowadays. And it isn't like the Olay ad.

Last edited by silverbirch; 12-18-2009 at 03:06 PM.
silverbirch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2009, 05:13 PM   #5  
Senior Member
 
JulieJ08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: California
Posts: 7,097

S/C/G: 197/135/?

Height: 5'7"

Default

I'm not sure I think it's right to ban photoshopping on the basis of women's self-image, but I do think it's ridiculous to allow companies use photoshopped images to sell products to improve appearance. It's just plain lying.
JulieJ08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2009, 07:36 AM   #6  
Senior Member
 
Palestrina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 4,607

S/C/G: 215/188/150

Height: 5'4"

Default

I have mixed feelings about this issue. On the one hand I think it is fantastic when beauty companies portray older and more real models in their ads like Isabella Rosellini, or the Dove ads. It's wonderful progress that we see ourselves reflected in the media.

On the other hand I am not a big fan of Twiggy's. First of all when she hit the scene in the 60's she transformed the world of modeling but not in a good way. Models at that time had an athletic build, and her appearance was emaciated. Models have been getting skinnier and skinnier ever since.

Furthermore Twiggy has not aged well when compared to models of the same era. I don't think she looks like a model anymore, more like a soccer Mom who smoked too much and I don't particularly think she's a good representation of the older woman I'd like to see in an advertisement. I never liked her personality on AMTM because I felt she was obviously prejudiced against minorities and favored the blonde white girls.
Palestrina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2009, 05:41 PM   #7  
Slimming down in San Fran
 
BerkshireGrl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 990

S/C/G: 275/191/150

Height: 5'8"

Default



This was Twiggy in 2006. That ad is just ridiculous.

ETA: I don't mean this as a slam against older women at all, but the misrepresentation by "beauty companies" to sell products. It just pisses me off to see such aggressive photo manipulation, especially when it affects the self-esteem of women viewing this ad. "Wow, if Twiggy looks that great at 60, I look like a saggy hag in comparison! I need that $$$ cream to be pretty again!"

GRRRRR.

Last edited by BerkshireGrl; 12-20-2009 at 05:49 PM.
BerkshireGrl is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:30 AM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.