3 Fat Chicks on a Diet Weight Loss Community  

Go Back   3 Fat Chicks on a Diet Weight Loss Community > Support Forum > General chatter

General chatter Because life isn't just about dieting. Play games, jokes, or share what's new in your life!

Glamour uses unorthodox picture of a woman (for a major woman's magazine)

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-21-2009, 03:13 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 6,182

S/C/G: 200/Ethan born 1-11-13/130

Default Glamour uses unorthodox picture of a woman (for a major woman's magazine)

I find this so interesting - this woman is NOT fat (I look almost just like this!) but it's so amazing to see folds, stretch marks in a major woman's magazine. I dont know why I am so pleased to see this! It is fascinating that she is considered "plus sized" by Glamour. She looks like a normal, healthy weight to me. If she were standing, she would have very little extra tummy!

http://jezebel.com/5341749/glamour-s...9Emodels-belly

I definitely struggled what to name this thread - I rejected "real" woman, "normal" woman. I finally went with "unorthodox" just because it's so rare to see such a picture in that setting!
__________________
SIX YEARS at maintenance weight!

My very long weight loss story

"I saw an angel in the marble and I chiseled until I set it free."
Michelangelo

Last edited by Glory87 : 08-21-2009 at 03:15 PM.
Glory87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2009, 03:23 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
WSChick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: So Cal
Posts: 113

S/C/G: 277 (2010)/274 (2015) /212

Default

I have this issue and it's wonderful to see more "normal" and average women in magazines. This is what girls need to see not those sickly stick figures !

I by no means am even close to looking like that but it's much more realistic and beautiful !
WSChick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2009, 03:23 PM   #3
a work in progress
 
juliastl27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: st. louis
Posts: 1,291

S/C/G: see ticker

Height: 5'6 1/2

Default

that top picture is GREAT. i really respect someone who can look so confident even though they dont have a "perfect" body. she is thin, but has the belly of women with children, lol. the second picture looks like it was taken to be more flattering and maybe airbrushed.
juliastl27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2009, 03:28 PM   #4
Just Me
 
nelie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 15,306

S/C/G: 364/202/182

Height: 5'6"

Default

Go glamour!!

I am proud of a magazine that can say 'yes women, it is normal to have a pouch'.

I wouldn't consider her plus sized either.
__________________
You can't out-exercise poor eating habits.
nelie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2009, 03:40 PM   #5
Becoming better overall
 
Starrynight's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 365

S/C/G: 199/160/125

Height: 5' 3"

Default

WOW! That is great! She doesn't even look plus-size to me, she looks.. normal! I'm glad they are taking this step, I honestly hate beauty magazines - I've read articles online by Cosmopolitan and found them to be either blatantly wrong (they misrepresented this study done in psychology and slanted it) or very contradictory - like telling women to learn to "feel sexy" - yet insinuating that you are NOT sexy because they don't have pictures of people that look like you next to the word sexy.
But this is really great, and I hope Glamour continues on this path.
Starrynight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2009, 03:43 PM   #6
Recovering Pantry Pest
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,120

S/C/G: 174.5/158.0, 0.0/<148

Height: 5'7.5"

Default

Wow. Holy moly. She's a 12-14? Must be about 6 feet tall! I think she's lovely, and real ... and it inspires me to think that just maybe, with some more work, I might have a model's body!!!
__________________
~ Becky ~
ICUwishing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2009, 03:46 PM   #7
Soul Cyster
 
beerab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: California
Posts: 4,487

S/C/G: 235/seeticker/135

Height: 5'3"

Default

Good lord if she is plus sized I must be elephant sized!

She IS beautiful btw.
__________________
beerab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2009, 03:47 PM   #8
a work in progress
 
juliastl27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: st. louis
Posts: 1,291

S/C/G: see ticker

Height: 5'6 1/2

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ICUwishing View Post
Wow. Holy moly. She's a 12-14? Must be about 6 feet tall! I think she's lovely, and real ... and it inspires me to think that just maybe, with some more work, I might have a model's body!!!

right? i think 12/14 is a stretch. im about a 14 and im much bigger than her. she looks to be about an 8.
juliastl27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2009, 04:02 PM   #9
Member
 
Teachyrchildren's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Boston
Posts: 94

S/C/G: 195/115/115

Height: 5.0

Default

I just e-mailed Glamour thanking them for using this model, and that I am hoping they make good on their assertion that they will be using more models with realistic figures--for fashion shoots, in ads, not just as one-shots. We've been far too accepting of the fashion industry's view that only a size 0 or 2 is beautiful. Make your voices heard, ladies!

Last edited by Teachyrchildren : 08-21-2009 at 04:05 PM.
Teachyrchildren is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2009, 04:05 PM   #10
I wanna be SUPERWOMAN!
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,158

S/C/G: 175-180/ 120-125

Height: 5'6 1/2"

Default

Yeah, this woman looks like an 8 to me, NOT a 12-14. I was a 12-14 at my HW (175-185 range) and uh, she has a MUCH nicer body than I did back then, FO SHO! I think she looks so beautiful and natural. It is AWESOME that Glamour put her in.

I have a few modeling/airbrushing stories to share with all ya'll:
I've done modeling on and off since I was 16 years old. When I was 18, I was doing an ad for Tommy Hilfiger with this hot male model. They took some photos of him sitting down. He had a perfect six pack standing up, but sitting down, his stomach rolled over JUST A TAD, as almost anyone's would in the angle they put him. SO, even though he had this great body, they fully airbrushed his stomach....
....not to mention MY make-up has been re-applied every 15 minutes or so at almost every fashion shoot I've ever done. One shoot even put foundation and bronzer all over my ARMS... and another made me wear a corset and then put some duct tape right below my rib cage in order to make me stand straight and tall at all times!

I stay far, far away from Cosmo. They ruin style. They ruin body image perception. They even ruin sex life.
__________________
Fit and fabulous forbids one from feeling frumpy!
*Maintaining my weight loss (give or take; this IS a constant journey) from October '07 onward * I could not have done it without all the support from the lovely ladies (AND gentlemen) on this site!

My GOAL Story
NightengaleShane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2009, 04:07 PM   #11
3 + years maintaining
 
rockinrobin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 12,070

S/C/G: 287/120's

Height: 5 foot nuthin'

Default

You know what just struck me? Wouldn't it make more sense to use "typical" women in ads? I mean if I see someone who is "typical" sporting a particular outfit as opposed to a reed thin woman, I can MUCH better relate to that typical woman and I'd be more likely to purchase the outfit - or the make-up, the perfume, the jewelery, the shoes, the hair dye. It could go on and on.

Who ever came up with using reed thin models? What were the advertising geniuses thinking?

Judging by the responses that Glamour's, received I think using typical women, would be a great marketing tool. Wouldn't that be something if that became the norm???
rockinrobin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2009, 04:14 PM   #12
a work in progress
 
juliastl27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: st. louis
Posts: 1,291

S/C/G: see ticker

Height: 5'6 1/2

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rockinrobin View Post
You know what just struck me? Wouldn't it make more sense to use "typical" women in ads? I mean if I see someone who is "typical" sporting a particular outfit as opposed to a reed thin woman, I can MUCH better relate to that typical woman and I'd be more likely to purchase the outfit - or the make-up, the perfume, the jewelery, the shoes, the hair dye. It could go on and on.

Who ever came up with using reed thin models? What were the advertising geniuses thinking?

Judging by the responses that Glamour's, received I think using typical women, would be a great marketing tool. Wouldn't that be something if that became the norm???
agreed. whenever i see something that i think is cute on one of those stick figures i have to sit there analyzing whether it would be flattering on a real persons body. (nothing against smaller girls, but size 0 and 2 is not what i consider to be "normal"). i tend to shy away from a lot of things thinking, well of course it looks good on her, shes teeny. if i see something that looks great on a size 10, i know that it must have a nice fit and be flattering.
juliastl27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2009, 04:31 PM   #13
I wanna be SUPERWOMAN!
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,158

S/C/G: 175-180/ 120-125

Height: 5'6 1/2"

Default

"Real size" models would be quite refreshing to see, indeed!

I think ALL body types should be represented in mainstream fashion if the advertising gurus really want people buying their stuff -- sure, stick skinny ones should be included, but so should those at a healthy weight and normal body fat percentages, athletic types, those with a few extra pounds, and those larger.

Whenever I see some outfit or dress on a twig-lookin' model, I, too, wonder if it would look good on ME. I just don't have a delicate frame and the only time in my life where I even appeared to was when I weighed under 115 pounds!
__________________
Fit and fabulous forbids one from feeling frumpy!
*Maintaining my weight loss (give or take; this IS a constant journey) from October '07 onward * I could not have done it without all the support from the lovely ladies (AND gentlemen) on this site!

My GOAL Story
NightengaleShane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2009, 07:28 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
thisisnotatest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 149

Default

Its funny. I always feel like I'm not really affected by the thin models. I think they look pretty, and I don't nec. Hold myself to their ideal. - guess it helps in a way that I'm short, so I just understand that I'm just not built like that.

That changed as soon as I was flipping through this article the other day.
The first thing I thought was huh, this is odd (I almost wondered if glamour was aware of the ladies belly). I have literally never seen a squishy belly in a magazine.
I thought to myself-hey, she's actually really pretty and her belly really doesn't look half bad. Maybe its not going to be such a freakin tragedy when I lose the rest of my weight and I'm still a bit squishy in the middle.

I instantly felt better.
Totally affected....
thisisnotatest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2009, 07:38 PM   #15
Senior Member
 
TracyB73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Diego, Ca
Posts: 375

S/C/G: 325/321/140

Height: 5ft 7

Default

My little sister is 11 and she is obsessing over her weight, she works out two hours a day, she wont eat any bad stuff as she calls, it she is constantly on the scale, I told her why, you shouldn't worry about that now, not that much , her reply I want to look like the women in the magazines everyone likes them, I was like that is what is wrong with our girls they aren't shown what is a "Normal person"
TracyB73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Posts by members, moderators and admins are not considered medical advice
and no guarantee is made against accuracy.


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:52 AM.






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2