Food Talk And Fabulous Finds Recipes, Healthy Cooking, and General Food Topics

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-01-2006, 12:37 PM   #1  
Shairing her ESH...
Thread Starter
 
Jen415's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Space Coast, Florida
Posts: 3,421

S/C/G: 350/321/TBD

Height: 5'6"

Default Which Jello Pudding would you choose--Fat Free or Sugar Free?

I've had both, and they taste the same. The fat free is 100 cals, while the sugar free is 60 cals and 2 g fat.

So which is better--no fat or no sugar?
Jen415 is offline  
Old 11-01-2006, 12:43 PM   #2  
My Incentive Pic
 
littlegg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 132

S/C/G: 175/166/150

Height: 5'4"

Thumbs up pudding

I love the fat free ready made cups, portion control, plus I dont like artificial sweeteners.
littlegg is offline  
Old 11-01-2006, 01:02 PM   #3  
Eating for two!
 
jillybean720's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 6,018

S/C/G: 324 highest known/on hold/150

Height: 5' 5"

Default

The instant Jell-o pudding is sugar free AND fat free (as long as you make it with skim milk), so that's what I use. I just mix it up right in a big measuring cup so I can measure how much I am pouring into each serving container, then pour into 4 small containers for 4 half-cup servings. No sugar, no fat--no guilt!
jillybean720 is offline  
Old 11-01-2006, 01:19 PM   #4  
Junior Member
 
mandagemini's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Denton, TX
Posts: 27

Height: 5' 1.5"

Default

I like the fat-free better, just because the sugar-free kind leaves a bad aftertaste in my mouth, usually. I'm pretty tolerant of sugar alcohols, but this just kinda burned afterwards (maybe it's just me...) I had the butterscotch kind (it was very good, but like I said, it left a weird feeling in my mouth).
mandagemini is offline  
Old 11-01-2006, 01:22 PM   #5  
Senior Member
 
kateful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 425

S/C/G: 180.5/157.5/145

Default

I don't like the taste of the sugar free, either.
kateful is offline  
Old 11-01-2006, 01:33 PM   #6  
3 + years maintaining
 
rockinrobin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 12,070

S/C/G: 287/120's

Height: 5 foot nuthin'

Default

I personally don't find those little cups to be satisfying enough for me to spend 100 calories. I'd rather have a non-fat yogurt, it's pudding -ish and has A LOT more nutritional value.
rockinrobin is offline  
Old 11-01-2006, 01:52 PM   #7  
Constant Vigilance
 
BlueToBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Fremont, CA
Posts: 2,818

S/C/G: 150/132/<130

Height: just under 5'4"

Default

I go with whichever has the lowest calories. Let's face it, you're not getting much nutrition out of pudding, it's all empty calories anyway, so you might as well go with the version that has the fewest of them (unless you don't like the way it tastes).
BlueToBlue is offline  
Old 11-01-2006, 02:26 PM   #8  
Eating for two!
 
jillybean720's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 6,018

S/C/G: 324 highest known/on hold/150

Height: 5' 5"

Default

Oh, and if you're interested in making your own instant pudding (which I think tastes much better than the little cups), I've found the Jell-o brand to be MUCH tastier than the Royal brand (plus many of the Royal brand flavors have more calories).

I don't think most puddings have any sugar alcohols, just artificial sweeteners. Sugar alcohols make me quite ill
jillybean720 is offline  
Old 11-01-2006, 04:06 PM   #9  
Senior Member
 
RememberHowToSmile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,689

S/C/G: 300/180/135

Height: 5'3"

Default

I like the sugar free. I tried to cut most of the sugar out of my diet so they little cups are a great treat when I am having a chocolate craving.
RememberHowToSmile is offline  
Old 11-04-2006, 08:35 AM   #10  
Senior Member
 
Tealeaf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,206

Default

SF here also. Like others have saidk, these are basically just empty calories. So if you're going to eat the empty calories, is it not best to have as few of them as possible for the same "cost"?

Assuming they taste the same to you, of course. They both taste fine to me.
Tealeaf is offline  
Old 11-04-2006, 08:42 AM   #11  
Eating for two!
 
jillybean720's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 6,018

S/C/G: 324 highest known/on hold/150

Height: 5' 5"

Default

Are you all talking about the prepared pudding cups? When I make instant pudding myself, I don't think it's all empty calories since I know I'm making it with my nutritious skim milk. I'm only adding 35 empty calories to each serving (the amount in just the dry mix)--the rest is milk.
jillybean720 is offline  
Old 11-04-2006, 09:34 AM   #12  
it's always something
 
Suzanne 3FC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 11,615

Default

I recently tried the pudding cups but didn't like them. It's strange, when I finished the cup, it was as if I hadn't eaten anything at all. The flavor was just so flat. It was like an artificially flavored blob. I expected to satisfy a chocolate craving, but I may as well have drunk a glass of water for all it did.
Suzanne 3FC is offline  
Old 11-04-2006, 09:38 AM   #13  
Senior Member
 
srmb60's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ontario's West Coast
Posts: 13,969

S/C/G: 165/147/128

Height: 5'3"

Default

Call me a nut ... others have ... but I'd really rather have yogurt or cottage cheese with fruit. There's nutrition in that stuff, yup!
srmb60 is offline  
Old 11-04-2006, 09:58 AM   #14  
Senior Member
 
rabidstoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 628

S/C/G: 351 / 282 / 135

Height: 5'3"

Default

I kind of like Kozy Shack no sugar added chocolate pudding myself, though I think it might be an acquired taste. It's not like Jell-o style pudding in taste. I think it's 90 calories and a bit of fat.
rabidstoat is offline  
Closed Thread



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:05 PM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.