3 Fat Chicks on a Diet Weight Loss Community  

Go Back   3 Fat Chicks on a Diet Weight Loss Community > Food > Food Talk And Fabulous Finds

Food Talk And Fabulous Finds Recipes, Healthy Cooking, and General Food Topics

Aspartame in Milk!!!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-01-2013, 01:20 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
betsy2013's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Washington state
Posts: 1,360

S/C/G: 396/353/160

Height: 5'7"

Default Aspartame in Milk!!!

I just read an article that made me so mad that at least I'll have enough energy to get the house cleaned today! The Dairy Association is asking the FDA to approve adding aspartame (and other artificial sweeteners) to milk and other diary products WITHOUT HAVING TO LIST THEM ON THE INGREDIENTS LABEL. The Dairy Association's claim is that this will help to get kids to drink more milk and thus be healthier. The truth behind it is that milk drinking has decreased significantly and this is another effort to add a sweetener to a product to increase consumption.

It's bad enough that they want to add artificial sweeteners to the diary products, but to ask to not have to list it in the ingredients is just downright dishonest.

I'm sending emails off to my Representatives and Senators asking them to stop the FDA from even considering this request. If you agree, please write to your Congressmen as well.
__________________

Mini Goals: Move Here Weight (2005): 344, Stop Smoking Weight (1997): 333, Mom Remarried (1990) 313, Twoderville: 299, Move to NC (1989): 280, Closer to 200 than 300: 249, More to Come....
betsy2013 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 01:22 PM   #2
Make each day count!
 
mccull83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Iowa
Posts: 362

S/C/G: 263.5/see ticker/180 for now

Height: 5'8"

Default

What!!!!? I'm going to have to investigate and find out if this is true! Who was the article written/published by?
__________________

So excited to be healthy and to FINALLY be able to wear the clothes in my closet!!! Come on weightloss!
268.8lb (starting weight)= 12/24/2013
230lb =
200=
190=
180=
mccull83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 01:25 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
elvislover324's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,689

Default

Wow Betsy, that makes me sick! To get the kids to drink more and be healthier? I don't know that aspartame is necessarily healthy for kids. And I don't like the sneakiness of skipping the labeling and disclosure.

I have nothing against aspartame in moderation (whatever that is...) for myself as it can't be as bad as any of the other junk I was putting in my body when I ate unhealthy fried, processed, etc. food. But I am an adult and free to make my own decisions. And I think everyone else should have that choice too.

Thank you for sharing that. I just screamed to my husband upstairs about it as I was so angry.
__________________
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Last edited by elvislover324 : 03-01-2013 at 01:27 PM. Reason: can't type well when I'm so angry!!
elvislover324 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 01:31 PM   #4
Make each day count!
 
mccull83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Iowa
Posts: 362

S/C/G: 263.5/see ticker/180 for now

Height: 5'8"

Default

Here's links to two articles about it

http://www.inquisitr.com/548725/aspa...r-rule-change/

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...n_2764729.html
__________________

So excited to be healthy and to FINALLY be able to wear the clothes in my closet!!! Come on weightloss!
268.8lb (starting weight)= 12/24/2013
230lb =
200=
190=
180=
mccull83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 01:33 PM   #5
Melissa
 
berryblondeboys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 5,899

Height: 5'6.5"

Default

I got that message too. What they will do to sneak in sugar.

Of course, all in the premise of, "We need kids to drink more milk, so what's a little bit of artificial sweetener to make it taste better? No harm done, right?"

Um...
__________________
My journey to a healthier lifestyle blog: http://melissaslife42.blogspot.com/



berryblondeboys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 01:40 PM   #6
Make each day count!
 
mccull83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Iowa
Posts: 362

S/C/G: 263.5/see ticker/180 for now

Height: 5'8"

Default

Here's a link to the FDA website where you can voice your opinion:
https://www.federalregister.gov/arti...dairy-products
__________________

So excited to be healthy and to FINALLY be able to wear the clothes in my closet!!! Come on weightloss!
268.8lb (starting weight)= 12/24/2013
230lb =
200=
190=
180=
mccull83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 01:45 PM   #7
Age 53
 
caryesings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NC now/MI for first 42 years
Posts: 1,652

S/C/G: 265/ticker/165

Height: 5'7"

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mccull83 View Post
Here's a link to the FDA website where you can voice your opinion:
https://www.federalregister.gov/arti...dairy-products
Thanks for this link!
__________________
caryesings is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 01:51 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Shrinkberry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 116

S/C/G: 222/150/138

Height: 5'3"

Default

Just to be clear, the milk industry wants the term "artificially sweetened" to be removed from the front label of milk products with aspartame. Aspartame, sucralose, etc would still have to be listed on the ingredient list. The FDA already allows milk with sugar to use the unmodified "milk" label. The milk industry wants the same treatment for aspartame. Seems like a minor issue for anyone who can read an ingredient list.

From the HuffPo article....

"Last week, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) acknowledged a 2009 petition from the International Dairy Foods Association (IDFA) and the National Milk Producers Federation that seeks to drop the FDA requirement to label milk and other dairy products as "artificially sweetened" when they contain sweeteners such as aspartame....

....The agency currently lets the dairy industry use the unmodified "milk" label for unsweetened milk or milk that contains sweeteners with calories, like sugar and high-fructose corn syrup "

Last edited by Shrinkberry : 03-01-2013 at 02:00 PM.
Shrinkberry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 03:21 PM   #9
Skinny chick
 
NCchickie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 115

Default

Drinking more milk will not make kids healthier, with or without sweeteners. They're not baby cows.
NCchickie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 04:09 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
CanadianMomma's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 231

S/C/G: 200+/168/130

Height: 5'2''

Default

I think the angle that they are trying to take is that offering a sweet-tasting milk beverage that doesn't have the calories (due to artificial sweeteners) of juice and pop they are offering a 'healthier' choice.

What I can't possible fathom is how they justify wanting to make it less obvious that it's been artificially sweetened by removing the label on the front. If it's such a great 'healthy' alternative, why are they pushing so hard to hide it from consumers as much as they can?
__________________

Last edited by CanadianMomma : 03-01-2013 at 04:10 PM.
CanadianMomma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 04:45 PM   #11
Melissa
 
berryblondeboys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 5,899

Height: 5'6.5"

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NCchickie View Post
Drinking more milk will not make kids healthier, with or without sweeteners. They're not baby cows.
This kind of stuff bugs me.

First, until modern times, babies were nursed much longer - until they were like four. How many babies do you think are nursed that long? not many.

Second, for a big portion of Eurasian descendants, they had a mutation that allowed people to drink milk (as all people were lactose intolerant). This gene change is extremely recent (like EXTREMELY). But it helped survival so much, that it spread very, very quickly.

Before the mutation and in parts of the world that didn't have the gene mutation, humans found ways around it - kefir, cheese, yogurt - things that took out the lactose to make it available for all populations.

It is the dairy from the animals that has helped us grow in population. While other things might diminish, the milk was there and was replenishable. And they are still trying to figure out why milk in it's raw form was even more beneficial to health - which it had to be to spread so quickly.

Now, do we NEED milk? No, we don't. But to say that kids don't need milk and that we aren't baby cows is going a bit too far. Without your ancestors drinking milk, they probably would have perished.
__________________
My journey to a healthier lifestyle blog: http://melissaslife42.blogspot.com/



berryblondeboys is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Posts by members, moderators and admins are not considered medical advice
and no guarantee is made against accuracy.


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Alternative Products that work in PHASE 1 showgirlaz Ideal Protein Diet 506 06-29-2012 10:15 PM
Former aspartame addicts? sacha Whole Foods Lifestyle 18 08-22-2011 12:03 PM
aspartame and memory medic4life 30-Somethings 16 08-17-2006 03:04 PM
Splenda & Aspartame PressinOn Weight and Resistance Training 20 09-04-2005 06:26 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:14 PM.






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2