Featherweights For those with just a few pounds, or trying to lose those last few pounds.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-25-2010, 12:41 PM   #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
SeventeenTheStar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 62

S/C/G: 140/132/110

Height: 5'3

Default Body Fat Percentage - Useful? Accurate?

According to the body fat percentage scale my mother has, I'm at 23.5% body fat. According to the Navy, I'm at 27% body fat. According to the YMCA, I'm at 35% body fat. Does that mean the Navy thinks my weight is acceptable but the folks at the Y look at me and think "obese?" Because that seems silly.

Does anybody here measure their weight loss using body fat percentage? If so, what method do you use to measure? Do you find that it is a useful way to measure progress and set goals?
SeventeenTheStar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2010, 09:15 PM   #2  
Yogini
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 658

S/C/G: 152/ticker/115

Height: 5' 3''

Default

I don't use this, but i believe most just take a measure of your height divided by your weight. Does the YMCA use one of those arm band or hand held things? It would be hard to imagine you are obese if you only weight 132 lbs. I am the same height and I believe the overweight category starts around the 140's...I don't even know where obese would start, maybe 160's?

Are they all using the same kind of tool to measure this?
Wildflower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2010, 09:42 PM   #3  
Calorie counter
 
Eliana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,679

Height: 5'4.5"

Default

I get the same random BF %'s. I like the navy's personally, but just because it's in the middle. I most dislike the handheld thing. I've heard the scale you stand on measures your lower half, the hand held measures the upper half and I'm not sure about the navy scale.
Eliana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2010, 10:50 AM   #4  
Blue
 
BlueIsis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: So Cal
Posts: 313

S/C/G: 181.4/134.8/115

Height: 5'2 1/2"

Default

The Navy method (assuming you are talking about PRT measurements) uses an algorithm derived from simple tape measurements and your height. It has been validated to plus or minus 1.5% when compared to hydrostatic weighing (I was involved in this research in the late '90's/early '00's). It does not rely on calipers or your hydration status (unlike bioimpedance methods). This is the most accurate way to determine body fat percentage other than hydrostatic weighing or autopsy.

I find it more valuable to use BF% to track a gaining/losing trend rather than as an absolute number. It is especially valuable when you are no longer losing weight, but are still changing your body composition with strength training. I hope this helps.
BlueIsis is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BMI - scale vs. chart vs. covert bailey method jendiet Weight Loss Support 27 07-09-2009 10:15 PM
Maintainers Chat: January 14 - 20 Meg Living Maintenance 137 01-21-2008 10:42 PM
Body Fat % Luvmyboyz Weight Watchers 14 09-15-2001 11:08 AM


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:59 AM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.