Exercise! Love it or hate it, let's motivate each other to just DO IT!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-07-2012, 01:34 PM   #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
GotothegymOKAY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 108

S/C/G: 175/150/139. Ultimate Goal:132

Height: 5'6

Question What's more effective, a short strenuous workout or a long so-so one??

In the beginning of my weight loss journey, I'd stay at the gym for an hour and a half and burn anywhere from 700-900 calories, but not strenuously.

Now that I'm closer to my goal (and busier!) I'll stay only for a half hour, and only burn 300-ish calories, but at high intensity (sweating and heart racing!)

What's more effective? Not working as hard but burning 800 at the end of a long session? Or a short session of getting your heart rate up high?

Thanks!!!!
GotothegymOKAY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2012, 01:35 PM   #2  
Stephanie
 
LockItUp's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 3,221

S/C/G: 236/135-140/More Fit

Height: 5'6"

Default

Are you talking only cardio?

I'd say weight training over cardio.

Intense shorter cardio over long moderate cardio.

Just my opinion though!
LockItUp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2012, 01:56 PM   #3  
Embracing the suck
 
JohnP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: California - East Bay
Posts: 3,185

S/C/G: 300/234/abs

Height: 6'9"

Default

More effective for what? If you're asking what is more effective for actually losing fat than what burns the most calories win.

Of course this has to be weighed against what results from this exercise such as the potential to increase hunger significantly and also how much time you have.
JohnP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2012, 01:56 PM   #4  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
GotothegymOKAY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 108

S/C/G: 175/150/139. Ultimate Goal:132

Height: 5'6

Default

Whoops- I mean strictly cardio for weight/fat loss!
GotothegymOKAY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2012, 02:18 PM   #5  
Here to Learn
 
EagleRiverDee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Alaska
Posts: 3,099

S/C/G: 225/140/135

Height: 5'5"

Default

+1 on resistance training over cardio- a good circuit training workout keeps your heart rate up like cardio AND builds muscle.

Other than that, many articles I've read recently tout that shorter/harder workouts have better cardio benefits over longer/easier workouts. But I'd say do the one you like best, because that's the one you'll stick with anyway. Both will give you health benefits.
EagleRiverDee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2012, 02:26 PM   #6  
Senior Member
 
Katbot24's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 518

S/C/G: 230/ticker/150

Height: 5'8

Default

It depends on your time. Technically, you can get similar results with both, it just depends on how much time you have to commit.

For example, on days that I have the evening off I much prefer to go for a 2 hours walk/hike around the river in my city than to spend 45 minutes on a stairmaster.

So long + moderate = short + intense is the short answer. Do what works best for you.

Technically, both activities have similar effects: burned calories (~500 range) and worked muscles (walking for 2 hours makes you just as stiff as being on the stair master for less than half that time)
Katbot24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2012, 10:14 PM   #7  
Senior Member
 
delyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Seoul, Korea
Posts: 186

S/C/G: 172/ticker/114

Height: 5'3"

Default

i would agree with doing a strength circuit or something. it keeps my heart rate up so i'm actually getting cardio done while strengthening my muscles as well.
delyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2012, 04:03 PM   #8  
Member
 
MrsCake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 45

Height: 5' 3"

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GotothegymOKAY View Post
In the beginning of my weight loss journey, I'd stay at the gym for an hour and a half and burn anywhere from 700-900 calories, but not strenuously.

Now that I'm closer to my goal (and busier!) I'll stay only for a half hour, and only burn 300-ish calories, but at high intensity (sweating and heart racing!)

What's more effective? Not working as hard but burning 800 at the end of a long session? Or a short session of getting your heart rate up high?

Thanks!!!!
Only 900 calories burnt after a 90minute exercise? Something doesn't seem right here..
MrsCake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2012, 05:05 PM   #9  
Senior Member
 
MariaMaria's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,350

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrsCake View Post
Only 900 calories burnt after a 90minute exercise? Something doesn't seem right here..
Only?

That's around 9, 10-minute miles run.
MariaMaria is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:45 PM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.