3 Fat Chicks on a Diet Weight Loss Community  

Go Back   3 Fat Chicks on a Diet Weight Loss Community > Fitness > Exercise!

Exercise! Love it or hate it, let's motivate each other to just DO IT!

Running versus Walking

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-04-2010, 11:09 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
DroppingPounds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 23

S/C/G: 319/314/200

Height: 6-3

Default Running versus Walking

I'm curious to hear the opinion of people.....I was told tonight by someone that running three miles in 30 minutes is essentially the same from a calorie burning standpoint as walking three miles in 60 minutes. Is that true?

And I'd also like to hear if anyone has some good suggested regimens to build up jogging endurance. Years ago, I used to jog about three miles a day, but there was almost nothing to it since my weight was about 200 pounds. Now I'm trying to figure out how to get myself back to running without killing my knees. Is there a good weight to start jogging again...something that wouldn't be so hard on my body? And if so, how should I build up to it?

Last edited by DroppingPounds : 12-04-2010 at 11:25 PM.
DroppingPounds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2010, 11:20 PM   #2
Reformed Chef
 
AmandaMamma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 91

S/C/G: 275.5/ticker/?

Height: 5'6"

Default

For starting you run you just have to see if your body can handle it. There is no magic number to start. I started a few weeks ago doing very short intervals. I walk for a few minutes, run for 30 seconds, walk another minute. And keep that up for a while. Now I try to run for 45 seconds and I'll just keep increasing.

There is a very popular program called C25k (couch to five k). Google it or there are plenty of topics about it. I believe that has you starting out running one minute at a time.
__________________
Journey began: 10/15/2010
Stalled in the new year with illness. Back on track mid March to getting under 200.

AmandaMamma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 09:36 AM   #3
Calorie counter
 
Eliana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,679

Height: 5'4.5"

Default

I heard this too and though I'm not certain, it makes sense. Running is more intense so you get more bang for your buck in less time.
__________________
Long term goal: To still be calorie counting 11/9/2010
mini goals: ~211-10% lost;12/24/09 ~203 class I obesity 1/28/10; ~199 Onederland/15% 2/19/10; ~188-20%; ~185 half way 5/14/10; 179-bye 180's 6/12/10; ~174 overweight 7/3/2010;169-bye 170's 8/13/10;~164-30% 10/23/2010159-bye 160's~11/1/10; 153-35%~12/23/10; 149-bye 150's~2/11/11; 145 normal~2/14/2011; ~141-40%; 139-bye 140's ~135 GOAL! (129-45%; 117.5-50%)






My "goal" story: http://www.3fatchicks.com/forum/goal...goal-post.html
Eliana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 10:28 AM   #4
I'm a SWIMMER!
 
joyfulloser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,767

S/C/G: 209.4/149.2/150

Height: 5'9

Default

Honestly...I would not run at over 300 lbs...I think it's waaaayyy to much for the knees/joints. I'd stick with non-weight bearing exercises until the lbs dropped a bit.

I started to run at 209 lbs and I remember it being MURDER on my knees at first...so I ended up doing more walking than running (30 sec. run, 2 min walk & repeat). As I drop the lbs, running has gotten a whole lot easier on my joints (running 3.5 miles 4 times/week).

Even now I alternate with non-weight bearing cardio like the recumbent bike and eliptical.

I'm no expert, and have no facts to support this, other than my own personal experience. Hope this helps anyways!
__________________
My WEIGHT LOSS JOURNEY ---> http://www.3fatchicks.com/forum/calo...op-26-lbs.html

FINALLY MADE GOAL! Pics here--->http://www.3fatchicks.com/forum/goal...goal-pics.html


Last edited by joyfulloser : 12-05-2010 at 10:29 AM.
joyfulloser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 10:39 AM   #5
Member
 
shelle58704's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Wichita, KS, USA
Posts: 54

S/C/G: 205/184/145

Height: 5'6"

Default

I do believe walking a mile or running a mile do burn the same calories. You are essentially doing the same work. Running just gets it done faster, and is better for cardiovascular fitness because it makes your heart work harder.
__________________
Count down to being the Matron-of-Honor!
shelle58704 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 11:06 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
CherryPie99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Northern NY
Posts: 1,921

S/C/G: 344/119/116

Height: 5'1"

Default

I used a couple of online calorie counters. It states that a 300 pound person who walks 3 miles in an hour burns 477 calories and a 300 pound person who runs 3 miles in 30 minutes burns 673 calories.
CherryPie99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 12:39 PM   #7
Junior Member
 
DroppingPounds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 23

S/C/G: 319/314/200

Height: 6-3

Default

Thanks to everyone for the responses! I've been doing some reading, and it sounds like running always burns more calories than walking, even if the same distance is covered. According to some of the things I have read, it is because the amount of energy exerted to keep your body at a high pace simply requires more calories. I suppose it's like a car with gas...a moderate speed is more efficient with fuel than a high rate of speed. Getting somewhere faster simply takes more.

All of the insight is greatly appreciated. I'll definitely check out the C25k program. (Thanks, Amanda!) I hadn't heard of that. As some of you havce suggested, I think it's best to just listen to my body and gradually push toward more running when it's possible.

Thanks again to everyone, and good luck on all of your journeys!
DroppingPounds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 12:44 PM   #8
Member
 
Alenna 52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Laurel, MD
Posts: 44

S/C/G: 198/158/145

Height: 5'7

Default

You can do both! Pick a distance (say 2 miles) and start by mostly walking, with an occasional 15-30 second jog. For example - 2 minutes walking, 30 seconds running, 2 minutes walking, 30 seconds running etc. Check out Jeff Galloway's run/walk programs - they'll take you all the way up to a marathon if you want.

After doing this for 3 or 4 sessions, decrease the walking time - 1 minute walking, 30 seconds running. Continue to gradually increase running and decrease walking and eventually (after a month or two), you will be mostly running, and you can increase your distance to 3 miles (if you want).

Just take it easy in the beginning so you don't get injured. And walking means at a "brisk" pace. I've actually walked faster than some people jog.

Last edited by Alenna 52 : 12-05-2010 at 12:50 PM.
Alenna 52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2010, 11:59 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
timkerbelle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 243

Height: 1.67m

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shelle58704 View Post
I do believe walking a mile or running a mile do burn the same calories. You are essentially doing the same work. Running just gets it done faster, and is better for cardiovascular fitness because it makes your heart work harder.
Yeah, I have heard the same thing.
__________________


Never let a problem become an excuse
timkerbelle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2010, 09:03 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,350

Default

http://www.runnersworld.com/article/...8402-0,00.html
MariaMaria is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2010, 11:25 PM   #11
Junior Member
 
DroppingPounds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 23

S/C/G: 319/314/200

Height: 6-3

Default

Thanks, MariaMaria! Absolutely fantastic article.
DroppingPounds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2010, 10:12 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
darway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: N.C.
Posts: 186

S/C/G: 250 / 210 / 210

Height: 6' 4"

Default

Physics says that moving the same mass a specific distance, is the same amount of work. But a human body is not like rolling a barrel for a mile.

You convert more oxygen in your bloodstream running than walking. You heat up more, and expell more water through sweat and increased breathing. So running really does burn more calories.
darway is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Posts by members, moderators and admins are not considered medical advice
and no guarantee is made against accuracy.


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Running my way to goal YP1 Goal! 33 06-12-2007 12:06 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:39 PM.






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2