3 Fat Chicks on a Diet Weight Loss Community  

Go Back   3 Fat Chicks on a Diet Weight Loss Community > Fitness > Exercise!

Exercise! Love it or hate it, let's motivate each other to just DO IT!

"Fat burning" zone vs. "cardio" zone?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-02-2007, 09:12 PM   #1
Susan
 
Artemesia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 40

S/C/G: 220/161.5/145

Height: 5'6"

Default "Fat burning" zone vs. "cardio" zone?

Hi everybody. I'm mostly a lurker on 3FC (reading the posts on this site is sooo helpful!) but I have a quick question about exercise machines. It's okay if no one can answer this one.

I love exercising on my gym's elliptical, and my heart rate is usually in my "cardio" zone (high 160s) and I feel good exercising at that effort. I'm just wondering if exercising at a lower intensity, in the machine's so-called "fat burning" zone, really helps burn the fat "faster." I'm pretty much just going by how I feel when I'm on the machine (if my heart's pumping nicely, if I'm sweating etc). I guess I'm just wondering if those different zones at which your heart is pumping actually affects fat burning. When I'm going at a higher intensity, I burn a lot more calories, which makes me think that's better than going at a lower intensity.

Edit: Oh my gosh, I just realized someone just asked this exact question a few lines down. D'oh! I guess you can ignore this question
__________________
"Today is where your book begins. The rest is still unwritten."

Artemesia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2007, 09:18 PM   #2
Meg
Senior Member
 
Meg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Posts: 9,160

S/C/G: 257/135/maintaining

Height: 5' 4"

Default

Hi Susan! Yep, you're right about exercising at a higher intensity being better for burning calories. I think you'll find your questions answered in this thread: Cardio versus fat burn?

We're glad you de-lurked ... keep posting!
__________________
Meg
Start: 257 - June 1, 2001
Goal: 135 - May 12, 2002
Size 22/size 4
Meg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2007, 09:19 PM   #3
Meg
Senior Member
 
Meg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Posts: 9,160

S/C/G: 257/135/maintaining

Height: 5' 4"

Default

It's OK that you asked it again ... it's a topic that a lot of people wonder about.
__________________
Meg
Start: 257 - June 1, 2001
Goal: 135 - May 12, 2002
Size 22/size 4
Meg is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Posts by members, moderators and admins are not considered medical advice
and no guarantee is made against accuracy.


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:51 PM.






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2