3 Fat Chicks on a Diet Weight Loss Community  

Go Back   3 Fat Chicks on a Diet Weight Loss Community > Diet Central > Does it Work?

Does it Work? Unsure if the latest product or service lives up to it's claims? From popular products to the latest scams, discuss it here before you buy!

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
Old 03-04-2006, 07:11 PM   #1
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 23

Default Negative Calorie Diet

I was just cruising around the net and came across the Negative Calorie Diet. Has anyone heard or tried this before?
calico_cat is offline  
Old 03-04-2006, 07:40 PM   #2
Junior Member
Sherrilb's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Oklahoma, since 1978.
Posts: 1


calico, I was suckered into buying that info on line, turned out to be the old "Cabbage Soup Diet". Eat tons of this special soup made with cabbage. I requested a refund and received it.
Sherrilb is offline  
Old 03-04-2006, 07:53 PM   #3
MrsJim's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Silicon Valley, California
Posts: 5,020


If you do a search here, you'll find quite a few posts regarding this diet. The theory is, that if you eat stuff that's really low in calories, like celery and grapefruit and that sort of thing, they take more calories to burn off than what is contained in them - thus the 'negative' calorie theory.

A couple threads from the past:

Negative Calorie Diet

negative calorie diets?

And if Suzanne doesn't mind me quoting her...she pretty much summed it up:

Originally Posted by Suzanne 3FC
If weight is lost, it's because the foods are very low in calories, so you're just on another low calorie diet. There really isn't such a thing as negative calories, it's all a myth. It is true that there are some foods, such as celery, that contain so few calories that between chewing and digestion, you may burn an extra calorie or two more than they contain. But seriously, the amount is so SMALL that you would have to binge on celery nonstop all day long, and it would still take a long time to see any result from that. You have to burn 3500 calories more than you consume to lose one pound of fat. At least that's all that the so-called negative calorie effect can do. Many of the foods on those lists don't even qualify in the same way.

However, they are all low calorie, and the foods are usually healthy enough, but not on their own. Any weight lost will be because you are on a low calorie diet, and NOT because you burned more than you consumed just by eating special foods. You still need to eat grains, dairy, and other foods to make sure that you consume enough calories and balance the diet nutritionally.

The whole "negative calorie" issue is a bad idea, it's just another fad diet. Not surprisingly enough, there are a lot of websites out there that want to sell those lists of miracle foods for $19.95. It's a gimmick.
Mrs. Jim
Highest weight: 265 pounds, size 24/26 (May 1990)
May 1991: 174 pounds (-91 lbs)
September 1996: 155 pounds (-110 lbs)
*LIVING at: 145-149 pounds, size 4/6 (-116/120 lbs)

*Maintenance = LIVING.
Posts by members, moderators and admins are not considered medical advice and no guarantee is made against accuracy. Please see your physician before taking advice found on the internet.

Wanna know how I lost the weight and have kept it off for over 16 years? Click here!
MrsJim is offline  
Old 03-04-2006, 09:08 PM   #4
Senior Member
Misti in Seattle's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle WA
Posts: 8,793

Height: 5'8.5"


Yah... what MrsJim said!!

Misti in Seattle is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:20 PM.

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2