3 Fat Chicks on a Diet Weight Loss Community  

Go Back   3 Fat Chicks on a Diet Weight Loss Community > Diet Central > Carb Counters

general carb question

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-11-2011, 09:44 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
flippychick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Northeast
Posts: 244

S/C/G: 150/150/135

Height: 5'7"

Default general carb question

Can anyone tell me how to calculate approximately how many carbs (or net carbs) you should be eating in a day? Is it based on BMI? I've looked all over online but haven't found a resource. Not Atkins-low, just what would be considered "low-carb." Thanks!
flippychick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2011, 12:55 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
QuilterInVA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Yorktown, VA USA
Posts: 5,153

Default

For a balanced diet, about 50% of you daily calories.
__________________
Susan

HW 356 pounds - CW 138 - GW 130


Life isn't about waiting for the storm to pass. It's about learning to dance in the rain.

Forget Yesterday. I am, where I am. I know where I could have been, had I done what I did not do. Tell me, Friend, what I can do today, to be where I want to be tomorrow. - Sigrad
QuilterInVA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2011, 01:04 PM   #3
Member
 
Tamsin78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Eastcoast
Posts: 63

S/C/G: 314/283/135

Height: 5'2"

Default

I found what seems to be a good calculator that takes age and weight into consideration at healthcalculators.org at the University of Maryland Medical System
Of course we need to recalculate for about every 5 pounds lost. Hope this helps!
__________________
url=http://www.3fatchicks.com/] [/url]

[U]Start date: 2/02/2011[/u]
1st goal met: February 25, 2011

Last edited by Tamsin78 : 03-11-2011 at 01:08 PM. Reason: sp
Tamsin78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2011, 01:43 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
flippychick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Northeast
Posts: 244

S/C/G: 150/150/135

Height: 5'7"

Default

Thank you!
flippychick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2011, 02:13 PM   #5
Soul Cyster
 
beerab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: California
Posts: 4,479

S/C/G: 235/seeticker/135

Height: 5'3"

Default

Well it also depends on you- I eat 35% carbs a day so that number is below 100 grams a day. 50% is a lot if you are trying to do low carb.
__________________
beerab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2011, 01:21 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Sskar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Arizona, USA
Posts: 216

S/C/G: 305/ticker/150

Height: 5'8"

Default

Just to throw my 2 in here - there is no should when it comes to carbs; no minimum daily requirement for humans; nothing essential about grains; etc.

If you are low-carbing and want to see how much carbs your body can tolerate before they adversely impact your insulin response and thus fat stores (inflammation and other nasties), it really is an individual trial. Just as with all diets, there is no "one size fits all". I can lose fat steadily now on ~80gm per day and keeping my calories <1200, as long as no sugar/starch/grains. Some folks have to keep their daily intake closer to 50 or even lower.

Also, the source of carbs makes a difference. I can do 2 servings of fruit a day (usually berries). A doctor friend only does veggies as he gets stuck when eating any fruit. (We both check blood sugars on occasion after a meal - not because we are diabetic or even pre-diabetic but because we want to see our insulin response to food.)

Remember, formulas rarely work in the weight loss world - even the BMI is misleading.

Last edited by Sskar : 03-12-2011 at 01:22 PM. Reason: spelling
Sskar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2011, 02:03 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
kaplods's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Wausau, WI
Posts: 13,312

S/C/G: SW:394/310/180

Height: 5'6"

Default

The one-size-fits-all "balanced diet" is a complete myth. There is ample evidence that there is no "balanced diet" that doesn't take into account individual variables.

The best argument (at this point) for undersanding those individual variables is Gary Taubes


This article is a nice overview of his main arguments for the appropriateness of low-carb for SOME people (and even hinting at who those people are):

Oz. versus Taubes (long!)

His Book Good Calories, Bad Calories is far more comprehensive of course, and provides an in-depth review of the low-carb research, but it does read like a textbook - so it's not always exciting reading (which is fine, it's informormative, not a novel).

I'm looking forward to reading his newest (I believe) book called Why We Get Fat: And What to Do About It (Borzoi Books) by Gary Taubes


But as to the original question, the state of the current science doesn't really give you a way to determine your target carbohydrates without personal experience - essentially experimentation.

You can start at the low-end and work up (as both Atkins, South Beach do) or you can start anywhere between 100g - 200g and work your way down (even 200g is considered low-carb by some, though most diets that call themselves low-carb suggest much lower).

Essentially, trial and error is all anyone has.

On a personal note, I think there's something to be said for tapering off rather than going cold turkey.

The diets that drastically cut carbs in the initial stages and then gradually add them back in, rationalize this by saying that the purpose of the "cold turkey" approach is to get rid of carb cravings. Personally, I think this is hogwash. I think the only reason the diets do this, is to produce an impressively large initial weight loss to sell you on the diet. Losing 4 to 10 lbs in the first week is alluring bait. Most of the initial weight is water weight, and the authors freely admit that - but let's face it, we're mostly just glad the weight is gone. Whether it's fat, water or muscle -it's very
difficult to know or care which is which on the scale.

I always experienced extremely unpleasant symptoms on induction, and they didn't go away after the two weeks (or even after five weeks) as Dr. Atkins suggests. Because I had so much weight to lose, and because Dr. Atkins said prolonged induction is fine for people like myself with a lot of weight to lose, I never considered going on to OWL (I should have),

In a very real sense, I chose to do Atkins "backwards." I was sceptical of low-carb when my doctor recommended it, so I started gradually cutting back carbohydrates. The weight loss is slower this way - much slower, but I experienced no carb-withdrawal at all, and I find that cravings diminish just as easily backwards as forwards.

However, dieting backwards, also yielded backwards results. My initial losses were zero, and then started small and snowballed. Initially it was quite frustrating, but it's become quite exciting. In traditional dieting, you're losing fastest when your motivation is at it's peak - in the beginning. You lose motivation as you lose less and less. Dieting backwards, you don't necessarily lose less and less. The snow-balling effect helps.

I'm not suggesting anyone rely on their weight loss results for motivation. It's too unpredictable. Someone might try "dieting backwards" and find that they don't lose any faster at the end, then at the beginning. If they pin their hopes on losing fast, they'll become just as unmotivated as anyone dieting traditionally.

I'm just saying that the "induction cures cravings" in my experiences is boloney (at least for some of us).

I've said an awful lot that mainly means "experiment," but the books I mentioned I think will help you decide where to start.
__________________
My Etsy shop (currently closed for the summer)

http://www.dreamstormdesigns.etsy.com
etsy link by permission from 3fc! Want to add yours? Ask them!
kaplods is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2011, 02:24 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
JenMusic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,118

S/C/G: HW:200+/Maintaining:<123

Height: 5'1 and a 1/2" (yes the 1/2" matters!)

Default

I have a related question - when I see all these carb counts mentioned, are these total carbs, or "net" carbs (which I believe means subtracting fiber grams?)?

I don't think of myself as a traditional low-carber, but I do try to keep my protein and fat grams at certain ranges. I just realized the other day, in an "a ha!" moment, that by keeping my carbs to less than 40% of my diet, I might be a low-carber who didn't know it. Added to that, most of my carbs are in the form of veggies.

At about 150 grams a day (including fiber) I'm sure I'm not in Atkins territory, but I was just wondering.
__________________
JenMusic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2011, 05:54 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
kaplods's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Wausau, WI
Posts: 13,312

S/C/G: SW:394/310/180

Height: 5'6"

Default

Fiber carbs can be subtracted from total carbs. In fact, sometimes you can subtract carb calories from total calories, because humans can't digest dietary fiber (cellulose), so the calorie counts on high fiber foods can be misleading.

The confusion comes in, (the "sometimes" in the above statement), in that in the USA, manufacturer's are allowed (but do not have to) subtract the fiber calories from the total calorie count (since humans can't digest those calories, it does make sense, but the only way to tell whether the label is counting them or not, is to recheck the label's math. Because of the estimation involved it really doesn't pay to do unless the fiber count is quite high).

In my experience, processed foods generally seem to subtract the fiber calories from the total calorie count, but whole foods like canned and frozen vegetables usually do not. It makes many high-fiber vegetables seem far higher in calories than they actually are. If you're feeding green beans to your overweight cow, then you have to count the fiber calories, because she can digest cellulose. If you're eating them, you do not hae to count those cellulose calories, because humans can't digest them.

It seems misleading to include calorie counts for calories that can't be absorbed.
__________________
My Etsy shop (currently closed for the summer)

http://www.dreamstormdesigns.etsy.com
etsy link by permission from 3fc! Want to add yours? Ask them!

Last edited by kaplods : 03-12-2011 at 05:58 PM.
kaplods is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2011, 09:16 PM   #10
look to windward
 
nightwasp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: GA
Posts: 64

S/C/G: 185/178/145

Height: 5'7"

Default

Thanks, kaplods. I didn't realize this about fiber carbs. Really helpful post.
__________________

Mini-goal #1: 167 lbs. Mini-goal #2: 159 lbs. (BMI 24.9)
nightwasp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2011, 04:44 PM   #11
Hug a Tree!
 
LandonsBaby's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,302

Height: 4'9"

Default

I wanted to add carb counting to my calorie counting so I'm between 1200-1600 calories and 60-100 carbs.
LandonsBaby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2011, 11:42 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
Karen925's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 1,114

S/C/G: 192/maintaining upper 120's

Height: 5"8.5" 51 yrs

Default

Kaplods gave you excellent advice. Record your calories and carbs, it is not more difficult to do both with the various online programs & apps available. Track your progress over time, and then make adjustments. It does not matter one whit what my levels are for you. They are based on my body and vary depending on my hormonal makeup throughout the month. Over time, you will know your levels.

It is a lot like basing your food budget on what your neighbors spend. Their factors are totally different from yours. You can always just start recording what you eat now then adjust down. The possiblities to approaching this are numerous.
__________________

Karen925
Karen925 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2011, 01:17 AM   #13
Senior Member
 
Sherrie568's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 108

Default

How many carbs should you eat daily?
  • 20-50 grams for fast weight loss
  • 50-100 grams for steady weight loss
  • 100-150 grams for maintaining body weight


(I don't remember where I read this.)

I'm eating between 1200-1600 calories and keeping my (net)carbs under 50 most days.
Sherrie568 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Posts by members, moderators and admins are not considered medical advice
and no guarantee is made against accuracy.


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Low Carb Chat: 1/28 thru Super Bowl-2/3! aud Carb Counters 109 02-04-2008 11:48 AM
have many of you lost a lot of weight w/out doing the low carb thing? mmkaa Weight Loss Support 52 09-21-2003 04:56 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:30 AM.






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2