3 Fat Chicks on a Diet Weight Loss Community  

Go Back   3 Fat Chicks on a Diet Weight Loss Community > Diet Central > Calorie Counters

Well this is interesting - it's not a fluke is it?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-18-2010, 06:50 PM   #1
Closet health nut!
 
ncuneo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,297

S/C/G: S268/C170s/G140s

Height: Officially 5'-6"

Default Well this is interesting - it's not a fluke is it?

So I started at 1200-1300 cals lost a couple lbs then stalled bumped up to 1400-1500 lost a few more and stalled at 180.6, then last weekend I had a big cheat on V-day and was up to 182.8 by Tuesday, and today I was at 178.8. The difference is this week I uped my cals to about 1650 daily average and I started zig zagging. Is it really true that sometimes you have to eat more to lose? That it's better to "burn" the fat than starve it? I'm pretty active, I do cardio almost every day at varying intensities. Or is this just a fluke? I hope not and I hope I lose a lot at this average because I'm really comfortable here, although it's good to know that I can survive at 1500, 1400, or 1300 if I have to to reach my goal, but I was sure hungry at those levels. Maybe as I lose more weight I won't be hungry at a lower calorie level. It's strange because I swear I lost the first 80 lbs on Nutrisystem at 1500, but I guess I wasn't working out as much. I'm pretty sure though that I've lost these last 9 lbs by counting faster than I did on NS.
ncuneo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2010, 07:05 PM   #2
Diet Started: 1/4/10
 
Wild Vulpix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 416

S/C/G: 164/ticker/99

Height: 5'0"

Default

Personally, I don't believe the whole 'eat more to lose' moto. I don't believe it's common for dieters to hit starvation mode either (I've read a lot of articles pulling both ways, and from what I've concluded is that, say, if you lose 2lbs a week on 1200 calories and decide to cut down to 700 calories... you'd EXPECT to lose 3lbs a week, but in reality it turns out to be 2.5. You still lose, and you still lose more, but at what point is it not worth eating so little?)

With that said, I do feel that eating more as opposed to less is best. Not because you'll lose more, but because it's more manageable. If you did go on eating 700 calories, you'd lose a lot! But in no way would it be healthy. Furthermore, eventually you'll want to cut your calories a bit more to help escape a plateau, and if you're down at 700 calories, or even 1200, cutting is not going to be fun!!

As far as burning vs starving... I side for the burning I don't think you'd lose MORE since it's so much easier to have a small pastry than to run on the 'mill for an our, however by exercising, your body reshapes, and it looks like you've lost more, even if that's not the case.

I also think you're appetite will go down as your tummy shrinks. My boyfriend, who has lost a bunch of weight (without even trying to!!!! GRRR!!! ) cannot eat nearly as much as he used to be able to wolf down. But, don't starve yourself! Maybe you should eat more protein and less carbs to feel more full?
__________________
~*~**Wild Vulpix's Progress Pictures!**~*~
Goal: Comfortably fit into my tiny pants be the time the semester (Spring 2012) ends!
Long term goal:


Mini goal:


One for every mini goal completed (5lbs):
Wild Vulpix is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Posts by members, moderators and admins are not considered medical advice
and no guarantee is made against accuracy.


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
TBL "FS4" - Blue Team Chat chellez Biggest Loser Challenges 914 12-10-2007 01:08 PM
Weight Loss & Chit Chat #221 Jane Support Groups 48 11-28-2006 11:34 PM
Sugar Busters Weekly Support Board 4/29-5/5 Debelli Sugar Shakers 187 05-06-2002 06:20 AM
Sugar Busters Weekly Support Board 4/22-4/28 Debelli Sugar Shakers 200 04-29-2002 06:45 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:01 PM.






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2