Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-22-2001, 04:54 PM   #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Magpie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Fredericton,NB,Canada
Posts: 25

Default new fibre rule ?

I have been counting points based on a maximum of 4 grams of fibre but was told the old WW 123 system didn't have a cap of 4 grams. Do any of you still go by the old way and deduct per gram no matter how many there are...say 6.4...would you deduct 60 cals or is it better for whatever reason to stick to the 4 gram max rule ? and does anyone know why this was changed ?
If the above info is wrong...I was given it by a local WW member not on this site.
Magpie is offline  
Old 09-22-2001, 09:31 PM   #2  
Senior Member
 
leader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: new york city
Posts: 121

S/C/G: 198/135/152

Height: 5'4"

Default

Hi. The reason it was changed was because the basic laws of weigh loss are still "calories in minus calories used = weight loss" and one of the things that was happening involved hi calorie hi fiber foods that were counted as too few points. So, a 250 calorie item, if it had 10 grams of fiber, was a "low point" food, but the math didn't work physically. (low fat, hi calorie hi fiber made it low points, but was still a lot of calories.) So, they capped the fiber at 4 grams (makes sense) and it changed the calculation of a lot of foods. They also reduced the points range (it used to be 7 and now it's 5) and people started losing weight better. I know every leader who tried the new system when it was introduced last year (between oct and nov) before it was brought out to the meetings, lost weight too. So, that's why they changed it. We DID tell our members though, that if you lost weight on the OLD system (when there was no cap on fiber) that if you wanted (needed) to stay at the old program, you might as well. Either way, you'll lose weight...
leader is offline  
Old 09-23-2001, 05:19 AM   #3  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Magpie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Fredericton,NB,Canada
Posts: 25

Default

You're right...it does make sense. I can see the logistics of it . The old way looked good paper but the scales told a different story for many. As you say, for some...if its not broken don't fix it . Thanks for the great explanation.
Magpie is offline  
Old 09-24-2001, 10:44 AM   #4  
Cowboy Up Chick
 
Kelly_S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Posts: 3,796

Default

Personally even on 1-2-3 Success I capped it at 5 grams.
Kelly_S is offline  
Closed Thread

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Beck Diet Solution – December 2008 – Group for Support, Discussion, Diet Coach BillBlueEyes LA Weight Loss 247 01-01-2009 01:49 AM


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:47 PM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.