Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-23-2009, 10:49 AM   #1  
Trying so hard....
Thread Starter
 
MugCanDoIt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,350

S/C/G: 298/298/145

Height: 5'7"

Default What is your blood sugar supposed to be?

I keep getting different answers. What is your blood sugar supposed to be?

For:

Fasting, like in the morning?
Two hrs after you eat?
Before you go to bed?

What are good numbers?
MugCanDoIt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2009, 12:05 PM   #2  
Onward and Downward
 
meowee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,485

S/C/G: 285/215/1??

Height: 5'2"

Default

I'd suggest that you ask your doctor or DEC about specific goals for you. Ev everybody is different.

In the meantime, have a look at the information on the American Diabetes Association website . . . http://www.diabetes.org/

As a general rule of thumb . . . your HbA1C should be below 7 and your FBGL should be below 125. After meals, you really don't want to see higher than 180 and by 3 to 4 hours after eating you should be getting back to near those fasting levels again.

PS -- just where have you been getting those "different answers" and just how "different" are they. If they are coming from your medical team, you should pay attention. If they are coming from non-ADA-sanctioned web-sites or from casual bystanders . . . well.

Last edited by meowee; 03-23-2009 at 12:08 PM. Reason: added PS
meowee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2009, 04:57 PM   #3  
working off those pounds
 
VermontChick's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 692

S/C/G: 350+/ticker/150

Height: 5'5"

Default

so, i just got an email from my dad. i told him that i recently found out that i am diabetic. he wrote back and said that the 'good news is, if it is caused solely from being overweight, it can go away when you lose weight.'

that would be one example of why i never took my risk of diabetes seriously. i always thought it would 'go away' with weight loss.

i personally feel that type ii diabetes by itself is a lot less serious than morbid obesity, which is also a disease that i have.

so that's how i look at it now.. what do you gals think?
VermontChick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2009, 05:26 PM   #4  
Senior Member
 
JulieJ08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: California
Posts: 7,097

S/C/G: 197/135/?

Height: 5'7"

Default

Healthwise, I would choose morbid obesity without diabetes over diabetes without morbid obesity. Diabetes greatly increases risk of heart attack, stroke, blindness, kidney failure requiring dialysis-dependence, and foot/leg amputations.
JulieJ08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2009, 05:37 PM   #5  
Onward and Downward
 
meowee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,485

S/C/G: 285/215/1??

Height: 5'2"

Default

Type II Diabetes, although definitely a "lifestyle" disease has many underlying causes including genetics. Type I is a different disease and is generally thought to be the result of a virus.

Diabetes and Morbid Obesity are so closely intertwined, it would be difficult to choose one over the other. Definitely, losing the weight would go a long way to ciontrolling your diabetes, but it cannot 'cure' it.

Last edited by meowee; 04-06-2009 at 05:47 PM.
meowee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2009, 01:23 PM   #6  
Junior Member
 
doggirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 21

S/C/G: 258/236/175

Default

I too was a bit confused about what my blood glucose levels should be. I was told one number by my doctor, one number by the diabetes educator, and when I did my own research on-line, another number (the lowest values were found during my on-line research). When I questioned the doctor and diabetes educator about my research, I was told essentially that they gear their information toward harm reduction. That's great, but I wanted numbers that would be ideal for my health. If I could, I wanted to eliminate risks not just reduce the harm done. What we eventually came up with was to try to never go over 7.8 two hours after meals - that is apparently when the glucose starts to damage your body. My ultimate goal was to be within 'normal' ranges at all times - under 6 before meals and under 7.8 at all times. Through hard work and some luck thrown in, I am now almost always under 5 before meals, and almost never over 7 two hours after meals.
doggirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2009, 01:28 PM   #7  
Onward and Downward
 
meowee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,485

S/C/G: 285/215/1??

Height: 5'2"

Default

Those are the normal range for "non-diabetics" and definitely a great goal, but very difficult for a diabetic to maintain over the long term . . . consequently the under 7 (under 125) number is usually considered the goal for those with diabetes.
meowee is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:35 PM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.