Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-11-2008, 11:27 AM   #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
aschenbrodel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Washington State
Posts: 184

Default Smart pop = 15cal per cup plain air pop=30 cals???

How is that possible that 1 cup of popped air pop popcorn, NO oil, No salt is double the calories of Orville Reddenbacker's Smart Pop??

I have figired and added and subtracted and divided and the calories keep multiplying!

It's driving me crazy!

Smart Pop
http://www.calorieking.com/foods/cal...XJ0IHBvcA.html

Air-popped popcorn
http://www.calorieking.com/foods/cal...BvcGNvcm4.html
aschenbrodel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 01:18 PM   #2  
Just Yr Everyday Chick
 
JayEll's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,852

S/C/G: Lost 50 lbs, regained some

Height: 5'3"

Default

They are saying that the one with the higher calories has more carbohydrate than the other one. That's the only difference I can see.

Jay
JayEll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 01:22 PM   #3  
kaw
Senior Member
 
kaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: US -- varies
Posts: 972

S/C/G: 159-ish/145/140-ish

Height: 5' 8.75"

Default

Just an idea but...

Calorie king gets its nutritional information from non-branded foods (e.g., "popcorn") from the USDA's nutritional database. It gets nutritional info for branded foods from the manufacturers.

This creates two disparities:
1) Manufacturers are allowed to round down, whereas the USDA doesn't.

In this case, air-popped popcorn contains (per cup) 0.36 g. fat. Smart Pop is rounded down to 0g fat.

It's not just the fat, though: smart-pop has .5 g. protein vs. 1.04 for air-popped popcorn (not that this is a good thing!) and 5 g. carb instead of 6.23. So, here are two other hypotheses:

2) Post-farm manufacturing processes may remove more of the kernel.

3) "Independent testing" more often than not works in the manufacturer's favor. (Remember the frozen yogurt episode from Seinfeld?)

Anyway, for one-ingredient foods I always use the USDA database, because I think it's more accurate. You can access it on line directly here:
http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp/search/

Kim
kaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2008, 01:05 AM   #4  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
aschenbrodel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Washington State
Posts: 184

Default

Well, I still don't get it.
But maybe a glimmer of truth in the fiber aspect. Manufacturing would take some of the husk off.
So whereas the plain air popped corn might be more calories, some of it is undigestible waste.

Hmmmm......well, I might buy that for a dollar.

I did write ConAgra foods to see what they say.
aschenbrodel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2008, 07:01 AM   #5  
Just Yr Everyday Chick
 
JayEll's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,852

S/C/G: Lost 50 lbs, regained some

Height: 5'3"

Default

Nutrition isn't an exact science. Measuring the nutritional calories in foods isn't exact, either--it's done indirectly. So there is bound to be variation. What we can say is, a cup of popcorn has 15-30 calories, depending. There is no such thing as an exact value.

If you go by the Nutrition Panel on the popcorn you buy, you'll be able to figure out the calories of a "serving" of that brand, and that's what you should use.

Jay
JayEll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008, 06:32 AM   #6  
very small boned
 
girl81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 808

S/C/G: 110/107/104

Height: 5'3"

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aschenbrodel View Post
Well, I still don't get it.
But maybe a glimmer of truth in the fiber aspect. Manufacturing would take some of the husk off.
So whereas the plain air popped corn might be more calories, some of it is undigestible waste.

Hmmmm......well, I might buy that for a dollar.

I did write ConAgra foods to see what they say.
Did they reply?
girl81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008, 12:13 PM   #7  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
aschenbrodel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Washington State
Posts: 184

Default

No, they never did reply.

Turkeys!
I may have to write them again.
aschenbrodel is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:05 PM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.