Weight Loss Support Give and get support here!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-06-2007, 10:24 AM   #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Kilketay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 357

S/C/G: 155/150/125-130

Height: 5' 5"

Default Scaling Back Calories

This may seem like an obvious statement, but I think it's something I missed in the past when I tried to lose weight: You have to keep scaling back your calorie intake as you lose weight in order to continue losing at the same rate! In the past, I would start off losing weight pretty quickly, but then it would slow down. I would wonder why since I was still eating at the same calorie level! Well, duh! I was skinnier and didn't need as many calories! So I've put together a little table to remind myself to scale back calories. Here's my estimate of how I'm going to have to change my calorie intake as I lose weight to continue losing. I just wanted to post this in case someone else out there is overlooking this like I was! I've already started reducing calories from 1800 (when I started) down to 1700. It's going to be really hard when I get close to goal and have to eat 1500 calories to continue losing at the same rate! The good news is that once I'm at goal (125) I'll be able to bump my calorie intake back up to 1900 calories and maintain the loss.

weight - maintenance calories - calories to lose 1 lb a week
148 - 2338 - 1838
147 - 2323 - 1823
146 - 2307 - 1807
142 - 2240 - 1740
140 - 2212 - 1712
135 - 2133 - 1633
130 - 2054 - 1554
125 - 1975 - 1475

I've used this calorie calculator, which seems to be pretty accurate for me based on what I know about myself: http://www.stevenscreek.com/goodies/calories.shtml
Kilketay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2007, 10:43 AM   #2  
Senior Member
 
WinterStarzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 673

Default

Sometimes a little chart reminder like this helps a LOT. It might get a little hard for a while, but like you said, once you are at GW, you can maintain at a higher caloric intake. Keep up the good work!
WinterStarzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2007, 10:46 AM   #3  
Just Yr Everyday Chick
 
JayEll's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,852

S/C/G: Lost 50 lbs, regained some

Height: 5'3"

Default

Hey Kilketay,

Yes, that's absolutely true--and it also explains why those with less weight to lose have a harder time.

I tried that calculator, but it gave me a BMR value that's too high, compared to what I get on an impedence machine or with FitDay's calculation. I've found that the lower value gives me more consistent results in my estimates.

Jay

Last edited by JayEll; 07-06-2007 at 11:51 AM.
JayEll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2007, 10:50 AM   #4  
Senior Member
 
lumifan4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: East coast baby!!!
Posts: 2,107

S/C/G: 196/160/125

Height: 5'5"

Default

wow....at 154, i am eating around 1200 calories. I tend to lose 5 pounds a month. I wonder if that means, the closer i get to 130-120...if i am going to have to cut down even further???? I know i can get thru a day on only 900-1000 calories, but wow...i wonder.....
lumifan4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2007, 10:59 AM   #5  
Senior Member
 
NightengaleShane's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,158

S/C/G: 175-180/ 120-125

Height: 5'7

Default

Wow...

Yeah, I went to that site, but I know it's off for me, too. It says I burn 3,158 calories a day with a BMR of 1,616. FitDay says my BMR is 1,534 and I set my activity level to "sedentary/bed bound" because that seems to be the most accurate calculation (my job, in reality, is "seated work - some movement"). I WISH I was losing weight at a rate that high!
NightengaleShane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2007, 11:15 AM   #6  
Senior Member
 
lumifan4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: East coast baby!!!
Posts: 2,107

S/C/G: 196/160/125

Height: 5'5"

Default

okay...after doing all of the multiplying, adding, subtracting...blah, blah, blah....it says that i could lose one pound a week on 1700 calories a week. I wonder how true that could be. I sometimes wonder if i am eating too little at 1200 a day, that if i did up my calories, i might lose more than 1 pound a week. But since i know i can lose up to 5 pounds a month on 1200 calories, i'm too afraid to try to up my calories any. If i go over 1200, i just eat less on another day.
lumifan4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2007, 11:25 AM   #7  
Meg
Senior Member
 
Meg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Posts: 8,974

Default

Guys, don't spend too much time fretting about metabolic calculators. The data they're based on is studies of (usually) normal weight college students. And they're giving you the average number of daily calories, though there's usually an 800 calorie range that daily calories fall in for people of the same weight, height, and gender. That's a pretty big margin of error!

But that's why calculators are all over the place and give such different results. No one can tell what YOUR daily calorie needs are unless they take you and lock in you in a lab for a week. IMO, calculators will only leave you frustrated when your body doesn't follow "the rules".

The best way to figure out your own unique calorie needs is to track everything that goes in your mouth for several weeks and see what happens. If your weight stays the same for a week, you've discovered your maintenance calories. If you lose a pound, you know you've created approximately a 3500 calorie deficit that week. If you gain, well, you know you've eating more than your maintenance calories. Keep tracking over time and you'll know precisely how YOUR body reacts to different calorie levels.
Meg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2007, 11:46 AM   #8  
Future Wonder Woman
 
trooworld's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 821

S/C/G: 248/see ticker/145

Height: 5'6"

Default

Man, I don't look forward to going down on my calories. I don't want to have to eat a lot of steamed veggies and salads. Right now, I can find things to make that keep me within the 1700-2000 cal range. Thanks for the info...it's nice to see how someone does the lowering of the cals.
trooworld is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2007, 11:53 AM   #9  
Just Yr Everyday Chick
 
JayEll's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,852

S/C/G: Lost 50 lbs, regained some

Height: 5'3"

Default

Hey trooworld,

You'll do what you have to do! Steamed veggies or not...

Jay
JayEll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2007, 12:53 PM   #10  
Senior Member
 
FreeSpirit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: WA
Posts: 917

S/C/G: 234/154.4/120

Height: 5'6

Default

You also have to remember that if you're working out, you're also gaining muscle which will rev-up your metabolism. So it could be, that if you're not losing anymore and working out, that you may actually need to INCREASE your calories to keep on losing.
FreeSpirit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2007, 01:43 PM   #11  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Kilketay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 357

S/C/G: 155/150/125-130

Height: 5' 5"

Default

You know, I just don't believe the notion that there are situations where you increase your calories to lose more weight. I've heard a lot of people claim that - but I've also looked at a lot of scientific studies, and not a single one has supported that idea. Every one I've looked at has shown that fewer calories = weight loss and more calories = weight gain. I'm not saying you're wrong or that it's impossible - just that I've never seen it scientifically validated. So until I have evidence that it might be true, I'll stick with decreasing calories to lose weight.
Kilketay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2007, 02:23 PM   #12  
Senior Member
 
srmb60's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ontario's West Coast
Posts: 13,969

S/C/G: 165/147/128

Height: 5'3"

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kilketay View Post
I'm not saying you're wrong or that it's impossible - just that I've never seen it scientifically validated. So until I have evidence that it might be true, I'll stick with decreasing calories to lose weight.


Robin, I agree with you about that. But I do want everyone to keep in mind that as you become more fit and add some muscle mass, you may not always have to drop your calorie consumption in order to keep losing.

Is there an old saying about borrowing trouble from the future? I agree with Meg (who wouldn't? she's awesome!) You'll soon see if you need to drop cals or not.
srmb60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2007, 02:51 PM   #13  
Senior Member
 
QuilterInVA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Yorktown, VA USA
Posts: 5,435

Default

Or you can up your exercise. Muscle burns about 50 calories more per pound than fat.
QuilterInVA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2007, 03:09 PM   #14  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Kilketay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 357

S/C/G: 155/150/125-130

Height: 5' 5"

Default

That's a great point about exercise. I've been exercising the same amount for so long I sometimes forget I could add some to burn more calories. As I get close to goal, eating 1600 and jogging an extra mile a day sounds a lot more doable. Thanks for reminding me!
Kilketay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2007, 03:23 PM   #15  
Senior Member
 
srmb60's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ontario's West Coast
Posts: 13,969

S/C/G: 165/147/128

Height: 5'3"

Default

Here's the perfect place for an intensity plug
I was walking over an hour and toying with weights. There is just not time for that everyday! The fitness guru's here at 3FC talked to me about intensity. I glazed over ... how???
I got a heart rate monitor! It's fun and motivational. You can go for a walk or Baby you can walk!
srmb60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:20 AM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.