06-07-2013, 09:55 AM
|
#4
|
Year 9 in Maintenance
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Central California
Posts: 285
S/C/G: 271/125/115
Height: 5'0"
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wannabeskinny
Anyone else try to match their BMR in calories?
|
It' might a bad idea to eat UNDER one's BMR/RMR for a long period of time,
although there are quite a few studies that don't think this is a problem.
It is interesting that the purpose of Weight Loss Surgery is to force people to do just that.
And people lose weight in that manner without creating new metabolic problems.
For many people, the problem here is not the mythical "starvation mode" as it is commonly perceived,
but the difficulty of actually FINDING one's true personal BMR or RMR,
since ALL of the charts are based on mathmatical formulas which are based on overall AVERAGES,
and the actual basic resting metabolism of individual people is often quite different, sometimes more than 20%,
For people with tendencies toward obesity, that difference is usually lower than average.
People also commonly overestimate the amount of energy they burn through Activity,
and use an activity factor % far higher than their bodies' Reality.
Charts are a good place to START,
but I think the only way anyone can really know their own MR is to track every bite
through a software food journal for a long time, at least 6 months to 1 year.
The results can be surprising. It is amazing how little food a short, older, obese person requires to maintain their weight.
I am a short, elderly, "reduced obese" female at "normal" weight.
The "minimum 1200 calorie" rule definitely doesn't apply to me,
and in fact, after 8 years of tracking my food,
My records prove that 1200 calories is a weight-gain amount up to obesity for my individual body.
|
|
|