Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-08-2011, 09:06 PM   #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Joszac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: WA State
Posts: 109

S/C/G: 198.5 /198.5 / 140

Height: 5'2"

Default Food labels and Calorie counters?

I have been counting calories to lose weight. I use food labels and calorie counters to do so. I am happy with my weight loss so far but one thing I'm not understanding is calculating fat, protein and carb calories. At the end of the day I add up my calories. Then I add up the fat, protein, carb (9,4,4) calories to see if they match. They don't. It is always close to 100 calories more when adding the fat, protein, carbs than it is total calories. Just to see what would happen I then subtracted my fiber (counted it at 4 calories a gram) and I can get closer to my calorie total than the other way.

So am I doing something wrong in the calculations or is it that food labels and counters are not true to the actual calories and fat, carb, protein per serving??
Joszac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2011, 09:23 PM   #2  
Senior Member
 
DixC Chix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Just moved out of denial
Posts: 881

S/C/G: 298/238...285.5/217/150

Height: 5'5"

Default

I think the 9/4/4 is rounded for ease of math. Alcohol is 7 cal per gram. 100 calories is still pretty close.

ETA: some food labels give calories after deducting fiber and some don't and neither is labelled as having done it one way or the other.

Last edited by DixC Chix; 06-08-2011 at 09:25 PM.
DixC Chix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2011, 09:29 PM   #3  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Joszac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: WA State
Posts: 109

S/C/G: 198.5 /198.5 / 140

Height: 5'2"

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DixC Chix View Post
...

ETA: some food labels give calories after deducting fiber and some don't and neither is labelled as having done it one way or the other.
Really? Wow, how can they do that and not have to tell you? Like I mentioned I'm happy with my weight loss but confused by the, IMO, rather large difference in total calories.
Joszac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2011, 10:34 PM   #4  
Renaissance Woman
 
geoblewis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: California, USA
Posts: 2,590

S/C/G: 363/306/185

Height: 5'10.5"

Default

They don't even have to give you an exact number for calories on the item either. The package can say 300 calories for 100 gm, but when you weigh the item, it can weigh more or less than 100 gm. And calories on packages are rounded up or down to the nearest 5 calories.

I always pad the calorie count by 10% and I don't count calories burned at all. And then I don't have to get so crazy with math. There's just too much math to be having real fun!
geoblewis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2011, 06:09 AM   #5  
Made of Starstuff
 
Lovely's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New England
Posts: 8,731

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by geoblewis View Post
They don't even have to give you an exact number for calories on the item either. The package can say 300 calories for 100 gm, but when you weigh the item, it can weigh more or less than 100 gm. And calories on packages are rounded up or down to the nearest 5 calories.

I always pad the calorie count by 10% and I don't count calories burned at all. And then I don't have to get so crazy with math. There's just too much math to be having real fun!
Crazy that even the nutritional labels that are supposed to be helping us stay healthy are "lying" to us!
Lovely is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2011, 09:12 AM   #6  
Dukanista
 
April Snow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Denver
Posts: 2,547

S/C/G: high263/current257/ticker/198

Height: 5'7"

Default

if you are happy with your weight loss so far, then I would say to just keep doing what you are doing and not worry so much about the math!
April Snow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2011, 03:53 PM   #7  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Joszac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: WA State
Posts: 109

S/C/G: 198.5 /198.5 / 140

Height: 5'2"

Default

Thank you all for your thoughts on this. I guess I just don't like when things don't add up the way they APPEAR they should. I'm not too concerned about it for weight loss just wanted to try to understand it. I guess if the 9,4,4 is an approximate figure that might explain some of the problem and the rest is that labels and counters aren't exact either.
Joszac is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
September Calorie Counters Blue Serenity Calorie Counters 196 10-01-2008 04:09 PM
Calorie Counters Chat-March 2007! aphil Calorie Counters 785 04-04-2007 12:33 PM
Calorie Counters Keep It Simple -- January! Eiluj Calorie Counters 426 02-01-2007 02:35 PM
Coffee drinking calorie counters.. Apolline Food Talk And Fabulous Finds 16 10-04-2006 09:30 PM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:03 AM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.