3 Fat Chicks on a Diet Weight Loss Community  

Go Back   3 Fat Chicks on a Diet Weight Loss Community > Support Forum > Support Groups > 30-Somethings

Thread Tools
Old 04-12-2011, 06:01 AM   #1
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 11

Default Just trying to make sense of it all--body fat %

I have been going to the gym since January 21, 2011 for 5-6x weekly. I joined a 90 day fitness challenge there on March 11th. From January 21st to March 11th I lost 13 pounds and dropped 2% body fat. When I weighed in yesterday for my weekly weigh in for the challenge they checked my body fat % again. I have lost an additional 5 pounds during the challenge but I lost 8% body fat. I don't really understand the body fat $ too well. I was really proud of the fact that I had lost 8% in the last 4 weeks after only losing 2% in almost the 2 months prior to this. A coworker always asks how my weigh ins go and when I told her I had lost 8% body fat she said "do you really think that is accurate? I don't put too much stock in the body fat %." So, I guess my question is what exactly does this mean?
my2kids is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2011, 09:54 AM   #2
Enjoying la bella vita
nationalparker's Avatar
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Midwest
Posts: 2,747

S/C/G: high water mark/working on it

Height: 5-4


Perhaps in the beginning you were losing water weight and once you got through any excess there, you got to work on the body fat. Sounds like you're doing GREAT - and don't put any stock in what your coworker says - sounds like a bit of a jealous streak in her. if SHE lost 8% body fat, she's put a lot of stock in it, I'm sure.

So close ... now so far!
nationalparker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2011, 10:48 AM   #3
Senior Member
Blinky963's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 132

S/C/G: 267/ticker/141

Height: 5'9"


Originally Posted by nationalparker View Post
if SHE lost 8% body fat, she's put a lot of stock in it, I'm sure.
Ha, too true!

None of it seems to be exact. The scale can't account for water vs. fat.... The BMI can't account for the very muscular... what they all are is our best chance at tracking and holding ourselves accountable. A way to set a starting point and look back at progress. What really matters are the inches we lose and how healthy we feel/are. but even this is not exact. 8% is good and you are healthier for it.
Mini goal July 2014 to October 2014

Long term
Blinky963 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2011, 11:08 AM   #4
Embracing the suck
JohnP's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: California - East Bay
Posts: 3,185

S/C/G: 300/234/abs

Height: 6'9"


How are they measuring your body fat? Bodpod? Hydrostatic weighing? Dexa scan? Those three ways are fairly accurate.

If they put you on a scale with bioimpedence or used a hand held bioimpedience monitor than no - not accurate.

If they used skin calipers it could be accurate depending on who took the measurements.

Considering the larger drop in weight resulted in the smalled drop in body fat percentage I'm guessing they're using bioimpedience and the results can not be considered accurate.
JohnP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2011, 11:16 AM   #5
Calorie counter
Eliana's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,679

Height: 5'4.5"


Right, along with what John said, apparently the scale version measures your lower half more and the hand held device measures your upper body more. I amuse myself with the body fat, but I don't put much stock in it.

We can all say that to you because you asked. Your co-worker, however, should just have said, "Congratulations!" LOL! Either way, you're still doing a great job and you are a making a difference!
Long term goal: To still be calorie counting 11/9/2010
mini goals: ~211-10% lost;12/24/09 ~203 class I obesity 1/28/10; ~199 Onederland/15% 2/19/10; ~188-20%; ~185 half way 5/14/10; 179-bye 180's 6/12/10; ~174 overweight 7/3/2010;169-bye 170's 8/13/10;~164-30% 10/23/2010159-bye 160's~11/1/10; 153-35%~12/23/10; 149-bye 150's~2/11/11; 145 normal~2/14/2011; ~141-40%; 139-bye 140's ~135 GOAL! (129-45%; 117.5-50%)

My "goal" story: http://www.3fatchicks.com/forum/goal...goal-post.html

Last edited by Eliana; 04-12-2011 at 11:16 AM.
Eliana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2011, 05:29 PM   #6
Tellin' it like it is!
mkroyer's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Denver Co
Posts: 1,657

S/C/G: RESTART:153.5/147/135

Height: 5'4"


your level of hydration at the time of measurement (when using Bioempedence) plays a HUGE role in impacting the results! HUGE..... perhaps you were MUCH more hydrated for the second time when you lost 8% than the first time that only showed 2%

"All the Secrets of your foundation shall come to light.... and when you lie, uprooted and broken in the sun, then shall your lies also be separated from your truths" Nietzche

"I do not workout. I TRAIN.
I do not eat. I FEED.
I do not sleep. I RECHARGE.
My greatest fear in this life is the fear of being ordinary
Personal Bests

10K- 44:42
1/2 Marathon - 1:50:48
5 miles - 36:12
mkroyer is offline   Reply With Quote

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
There has become Normalcy in Craziness (trying to grasp the Big Motivation). Hermit Girl Weight Loss Support 33 03-17-2009 02:22 PM
I'm so freakin' bummed out!!!! (Had to let go of some pain) butterfly_dreams Carb Counters 46 03-10-2008 07:47 PM
Back to Basics -- February -- Bring it ON!! redballoon Support Groups 128 03-01-2005 05:25 PM

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:47 AM.

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2