General chatter Because life isn't just about dieting. Play games, jokes, or share what's new in your life!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-16-2009, 11:54 PM   #1  
Paleo-ish Girl
Thread Starter
 
Altari's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 942

S/C/G: 255.5/174/160

Height: 5'6"

Default I'm speechless. More Ralph Lauren monstrosities.

My husband just sent me this link and I had to share.

http://i34.tinypic.com/fu3u46.jpg

I feel sorry for this poor girl. She looks as if she was beautiful and had a beautiful body to start with. Now, she looks like an out of proportion child's doll with a MASSIVE head atop of teenie-tiny body.

This is the second Ralph Lauren "Photoshop disaster" in the last month. Here's the first...

http://www.boingboing.net/2009/10/06...sm-that-r.html

OMGz...No wonder woman have body hang-ups. There's something morally and ethically wrong with this.
Altari is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2009, 12:19 AM   #2  
Senior Member
 
kaplods's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Wausau, WI
Posts: 13,383

S/C/G: SW:394/310/180

Height: 5'6"

Default

My husband and I got onto this subject the other day, while he was watching some japanese anime. The proportions on the wome were so distorted (their eyes took up half the surface area of their face), that I pointed out that if you ran across someone with the proportions in anime (and increasingly photos in fashion ads), you'd suspect the person was from another planet.

Sadly though in animation - you KNOW that the figures are drawings and do not reflect reality, but it's not always so clear with photos. Especially young teen girls (and increasingly teen boys) are especially vulnerable to body perception issues (even without such unrealistic standards to aspire to), and aside from the fashion industry not just using nearly (or known) anorexic models, but photoshopping them even further to unsurviveable proportions, is just unconscionable to me.
kaplods is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2009, 01:13 AM   #3  
Senior Member
 
JulieJ08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: California
Posts: 7,097

S/C/G: 197/135/?

Height: 5'7"

Default

I don't even get it. Those were actual published ads? Because they are so far-fetched as to just be laughable and stupid. I'd expect a photo-shopper to get fired over pictures like that.
JulieJ08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2009, 02:11 AM   #4  
Inspired
 
Minya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 156

S/C/G: 275 / 208 / 135

Height: 5'5"

Default

< agrees with julie
Minya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2009, 02:11 AM   #5  
n00b
 
LasVegasLove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 11

S/C/G: 200/200/135

Height: 5'3"

Default

Ugh. Honestly it's not any where near attractive if I went and asked my very thin husband right now if that looked good he would tell me it looks sick and not in a good way.

Last edited by LasVegasLove; 10-17-2009 at 02:11 AM.
LasVegasLove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2009, 09:05 AM   #6  
Anne
 
RealCdn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,631

S/C/G: 407/358-Dec2007/tracker/125

Height: 5'4"

Default

Actually, it gets worse. At 5'10" and 120 pounds, the model in question was fired from Ralph Lauren for being overweight.

http://www.nydailynews.com/lifestyle...g_too_fat.html
RealCdn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009, 12:56 AM   #7  
Senior Member
 
kuhrisuh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,011

S/C/G: 249/175/149

Height: 5'8"

Default

UGH I saw these the other day.. unbelievable.
kuhrisuh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009, 02:12 AM   #8  
Escape from my fat suit
 
better health3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 451

S/C/G: 290/210/130

Default

I saw this the other day. The ads look like freaks of nature= not in this lifetime, so unsexy. I can see why the model is offended. I will never look at this brand the same.

It is getting so crazy with all the altering.

Last edited by better health3; 10-19-2009 at 02:13 AM.
better health3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2009, 06:59 AM   #9  
So hungry
 
dedicateddog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 23

S/C/G: 195/194/125

Lightbulb Re:

Although I do see that this has a serious tone, I couldn't help but laugh at those photos. It is so unbelievable that a company thought they could push the bar that far, lol. The sad part is that too many other companies push too far, without getting caught.
dedicateddog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2009, 12:27 AM   #10  
Member
 
Breezy10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 32

S/C/G: 192/168/140

Default

I agree dedicateddog--other companies do this too.
Breezy10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2009, 06:03 PM   #11  
Junior Member
 
Sasafrass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 13

S/C/G: 216.5/214/140

Height: 5' 6"

Default

It's just plain creepy...
Sasafrass is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2009, 05:13 PM   #12  
Senior Member
 
Taurie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: London
Posts: 596

S/C/G: 129/see ticker/110

Height: 5'1"

Default

I've worked in the fashion industry and I agree it's just awful when it comes to the female form.

During London Fashion Week a stylist walked out... he didn't want to dress a UK size 14!

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/fashion/l...14-models.html

One really has to question, who are these people in the fashion industry setting up these standards?

Last edited by Taurie; 10-22-2009 at 05:13 PM.
Taurie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2009, 06:05 PM   #13  
Cindy
 
cinderpa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Port Orange, FL
Posts: 175

S/C/G: 289/193/145

Height: 5'4"

Default

If you notice, these designers don't set this unrealistic goal for themselves.
cinderpa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2009, 06:37 PM   #14  
Becoming better overall
 
Starrynight's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 365

S/C/G: 199/160/125

Height: 5' 3"

Default

ugh I'm getting seriously fed up with this whole fixation when it comes to the fashion industry with being thin. Why does Ralph Lauren even use human beings in their photos? They should just get a pole and dress the way they want it to look because that's obviously what they are going for. It's so ridiculous, if companies want their models to look unhuman and unhealthy, then they should just forgo using people as models and friggin' use robots to walk down their catwalks, thats pretty much what they are going for! I detest this. It's also quite ridiculous because they are marketing to normal-sized women, not other models.. Even if fashion is supposed to be some sort of art or a sort of escapism for the average person, there still has to be some level of reality, and if there is no room for it, why even bother having models..

I found a size by size pic of the model, hope you don't mind if I post it

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/pict...lebrities.html

um, you could already see some of her ribcage in the first photo, that's not skinny enough..?!

Last edited by Starrynight; 10-22-2009 at 06:40 PM.
Starrynight is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:04 PM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.