Weight and Resistance Training Boost weight loss, and look great!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-19-2008, 11:00 AM   #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Kritter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 160

S/C/G: 185/see ticker/145

Height: 5'4"

Cool Original BFL or BFL for Women?

Sorry if this question has been posted before! I looked around and didn't see one so I need to ask.

Is there a real big difference between the plans other than the one for women is portion controlled specifically for women?

And also which one do you prefer?

If there are other plans out there that are good or better any advice would be great!

BTW: My goal is weight loss and to be toned and strong!

Thanks!
Kritter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2008, 11:08 AM   #2  
Just Me
 
nelie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 14,707

S/C/G: 364/--/182

Height: 5'6"

Default

There isn't a huge difference but I like the workout plan in the original BFL. Some people commented that they liked some of the eating advice in BFL for women. My overall recommendation though would be the original BFL.
nelie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2008, 11:11 AM   #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The Deep South
Posts: 4,445

S/C/G: 237/165.8/130

Height: 5'4"

Default

I haven't read BFL for women, but my understanding is that the biggest changes in it are in the eating section and in doing more pushing of the idea that women *can* lift heavy. It sounds very similar to the difference between the original New Rules of Lifting and the New Rules of Lifting for Women - which I have read both of.

I'd start with BFL, if it were me.

.
PhotoChick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2008, 11:30 AM   #4  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Kritter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 160

S/C/G: 185/see ticker/145

Height: 5'4"

Default

Thanks for the advice! I know the BFL for Women seems to be more geared towards "a woman's specific needs" food wise and exercise. I just didn't know if the original was too much food for women? Or if you have to figure out a calorie intake and that whole thing. Also if the exercises were different?
Kritter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2008, 11:45 AM   #5  
Let's salsa!
 
Tomato's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,396

S/C/G: 208/160/158 for now

Height: 5'9"

Default

Go with the original BFL by Bill Phillips. (By the way, you can get it cheaply on eBay - that's where I got mine).

As Skwigg puts it - the BFL for Women was "dumbed down for the little ladies".
Tomato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2008, 11:57 AM   #6  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Kritter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 160

S/C/G: 185/see ticker/145

Height: 5'4"

Default

"As Skwigg puts it - the BFL for Women was "dumbed down for the little ladies".

Wow... maybe I will get the original one then! Thanks for the input.
Kritter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2008, 07:58 PM   #7  
Mel
Senior Member
 
Mel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 6,963

Default

I found that the original was too much food for me, but I was pretty close to my goal weight when I started it. Over the first 12 week challenge, I gained 3 pounds on the scale, but lost two pants sizes.

Mel
Mel is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:34 PM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.