Originally Posted by wyllenn
But what's interesting is that this research was presented in the book as a "classic" study, and it doesn't feel that way to me. But look at what we had to do to figure that out!
What do others think?? Am I being too critical here of this description as a "classic"?
No, I don't think you are being to critical at all...I feel as you do...but then again I am a Psychology person too (not a Professor like you, but a degree-holding "buff" all the same