3 Fat Chicks on a Diet Weight Loss Community  

Go Back   3 Fat Chicks on a Diet Weight Loss Community > Support Forum > Support Groups > 100 lb. Club

Have sizes changed?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-05-2008, 04:59 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Lyn2007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,416

S/C/G: 278/see ticker/168

Height: 5'6"

Default Have sizes changed?

Back in the late 80's, I was 5'6 and weighed 140-145 pounds. I always wore a size 10 jeans. On very rare occasion I could fit into an 8.

It seems to me that what used to be a size 10 is now like, a size 8. All the sizes seem to have gogtten bigger!I just can't see how anyone who is 170-180 pounds can wear size 10 jeans. Am I nuts? Anyone else notice this? When did sizes change?
__________________
Lyn
Lost 103 pounds, regained 60+, taking it off again.
My Blog:
www.escapefromobesity.net
*Never Give Up!*
Lyn2007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2008, 05:02 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
barbygirl43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 3,354

S/C/G: 344/279.1/???

Height: 5'6"

Default

Yes they changed a few years back. I think if you do a search on vanity sizing, you might find more info about it.
__________________
Dawnyal

Halloween Goal


barbygirl43 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2008, 05:04 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
peachcake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Silverton, OR
Posts: 561

S/C/G: 217/tick/160

Height: 5'5

Default

I think it depends on the brand. I'm 207 and wear a size 13/14 (and my pants are getting too big). Of course, I wear a 13 in juniors, sometimes in womens a 14 is WAY too big and sometimes it's WAY too small. My sister wears a size 8/10 and always has... I really don't know.
__________________
LONG TERM GOAL: 160
peachcake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2008, 05:18 PM   #4
Member
 
LovemyPuppies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 33

S/C/G: 186/175.5/160

Height: 5.5

Default

I definately notice that clothing sizes are way off today... When I try on my mom or grandma's clothes from when they were my age I can't squeeze into a 12 at all... but that is the size I currently wear. It also seems that some brands just make their clothes whatever size they want b/c I can wear from a 10 to a 14 depending on the brand...
LovemyPuppies is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2008, 05:21 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Rayelle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Bellevue, Wa
Posts: 149

S/C/G: 305/300/1-236/2-180

Height: 5' 6"

Default

I've heard that like every 5 years or something they change the dimensions for jeans and in general clothing.
__________________
Rayelle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2008, 05:22 PM   #6
Taking life by the horns
 
BrandNewJen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Western New York
Posts: 517

S/C/G: 302/ticker/215

Height: 6'1"

Default

Also, don't forget that people as a WHOLE are getting bigger! People are a ton taller these days--- I mean, my cousins who are in their early teens (including a girl) are all over 5'11" tall!!!!

The taller we are, the wider we are so that our stature can handle the extra height...

Speaking of which--- I remember last summer there was an article in our paper about how a local Theodore Roosevelt Historical Society was putting on a fashion show of Wedding Dresses worn around that time in history. WEDDING dresses. And they said the only females who could model them were 10 year old girls. Amazing, huh???
__________________


One for every 5 pounds lost .......

Mini-Goal: Maid of Honor on 5/23/09 !!
BrandNewJen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2008, 05:42 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 6,182

S/C/G: 200/Ethan born 1-11-13/130

Default

According to some studies, Americans don't seem to be getting any taller anymore.
http://www.bioedonline.org/news/news.cfm?art=1354
http://www.newyorker.com/archive/200.../040405fa_fact
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/apr/04/usa
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/s...oryId=12787664
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/...055655965.html

Vanity sizing definitely exists. Around 10 years ago, I weighed 140 lbs for around a year. I kept most of my size 10 clothes and now I weigh 127 lbs. A gorgeous pair of wool, lined size 10 pants from Ann Taylor circa 1995 fits almost perfectly. I also have a lovely size 10 black silk dress from the same timeframe which fits perfectly.

I now wear a size 6 (sometimes a FOUR) at Ann Taylor (I find them one of the most egregious in the vanity-sizing department). I have to admit, it's effective, I bought the first pair of size 4 pants that ever fit.
__________________
SIX YEARS at maintenance weight!

My very long weight loss story

"I saw an angel in the marble and I chiseled until I set it free."
Michelangelo
Glory87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2008, 05:45 PM   #8
M.S. + living balance
 
valpal23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Thompson, MB Canada
Posts: 1,061

S/C/G: 325/200's/199

Height: 5'10"

Default

sizes changed in the last 4 or 5 years at the stores I shop at in Canada... I went from being a clothing crazed teen.. to a broke university student.. and stayed in denial so much longer because the number 'stayed the same' for the few times I shopped through my undergrad. nah uh!
__________________


I can't be perfect but I CAN persevere



Last edited by valpal23 : 03-05-2008 at 05:49 PM.
valpal23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2008, 05:50 PM   #9
Low Carb Lolita
 
Azure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 855

S/C/G: 185/see ticker/135

Height: 5'7"

Default

I'm 159, 5'7" and I'm currently wearing 13s. They're even a little snug (I HATE muffin top with a burning passion--so something that one person might not notice on me as muffin top, I see and I hate it). My goal's about 135--145, depending on how I look/feel at those weights--I'm not sure if I'll ever make it below a 9/10. We'll see. I guess it depends on how your body's shaped, your body fat % vs your muscle mass %...all that jazz.
Azure is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2008, 07:17 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
PaulaM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: California
Posts: 680

Height: 5'5"

Default

I kept a dress I loved from the 70s. It was a size 10. The measurements I had then are now a size 0 or 2. Which is really really depressing cause that makes the 20s I'm wearing now, what, about ten times worse? Gotta keep trying though
PaulaM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2008, 07:51 PM   #11
Just Me
 
nelie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 15,178

S/C/G: 364/202/182

Height: 5'6"

Default

Vanity sizing proliferates partially because if you had an item in size 8 and an item in size 12 and they both fit, which would you buy? Often women are more likely to buy the smaller size.

Although it would be nice if sizing would be consistent. I have size 16 pants that are baggy on me. I have some size 14s that fit me but I needed to find some clothes a size down so I went shopping this weekend. Many 14s fit me perfectly, some were a bit snug, size 12 was way snug. I then tried on a size 16 and they were as snug as the size 12s.
__________________
You can't out-exercise poor eating habits.
nelie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2008, 09:24 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
LisaF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 403

S/C/G: 288/ticker/145

Height: 5'5"

Default

I recently read an excerpt of the first chapter of Meg Cabot's novel, "Size 12 is Not Fat." I plan to read the whole thing as time permits, but the excerpt is a hysterical take on vanity sizing. Luckily, it's up on her website. It's pretty short, and definitely worth the read. Enjoy

http://www.megcabot.com/size12/size12isnotfat.php

Lisa
__________________


My Progress Pics ---My Blog
LisaF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2008, 09:43 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
kaplods's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Wausau, WI
Posts: 13,330

S/C/G: SW:394/310/180

Height: 5'6"

Default

Hilarious.

I recently read an article online about the history of standardize sizing, and apparently, except for a couple of decades, it's pretty much been a myth. And attempts to standardize sizing is a bit of a failed experiment. It was first envisioned in the late 30's, implemented in the 40's and pretty much abandoned by the 80's.

Before the computer age, pretty much every clothing manufacturer determined their own sizing, and there was no consistency whatsoever (kind of like today). Then with the advent of computers, a big study was done to determine the "average" size of women to design and mandate a standard - with the size of 10 being assigned to the completely average woman. From the start it was assumed that every few years the standards would be revised (thus a 10 would always reflect the average woman, even if the average changed). The problem of course is that while you can average measurements, women are not all going to fit neatly into each size category, no matter how you determine and divide them. Many women will be one size in the bust and one size in the hips, so finding clothing that fits "perfectly" is still going to vary by size, cut, style and manufacturer.

As a result, the attempt to force manufacturer's to adhere to standard sizing was pretty much abandoned (except in sewing patterns, where sizing standards are still mandated).
__________________
My Etsy shop (currently closed for the summer)

http://www.dreamstormdesigns.etsy.com
etsy link by permission from 3fc! Want to add yours? Ask them!

Last edited by kaplods : 03-05-2008 at 09:46 PM.
kaplods is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2008, 02:43 AM   #14
Geek and like it.
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: i am neither greek nor athenian, but a citizen of the world.
Posts: 328

Default

Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Vanity sizing proliferates partially because if you had an item in size 8 and an item in size 12 and they both fit, which would you buy? Often women are more likely to buy the smaller size.
Totally. This really, really annoys me because I'd like to think women are smarter than that, but I can't exactly claim to be immune. I like to wear a UK 8, and if I need the 10 I get sad, even though I have 8s that are manifestly bigger than some 10s! And my mum has some 10s from when she was in her twenties and lemme tell you - I can *just about* squeeze into them...if I don't breathe too much!
Another thing shops do is put 'thin' mirrors in changing rooms. So you think you look better in their clothes than you really do, and buy them. I'm a sucker for that one, too
__________________
Jude
Me23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2008, 04:55 AM   #15
Senior Member
 
sharonrr1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: central wisconsin
Posts: 325

S/C/G: 34% b.f./31.1%/25%

Height: 5'7"

Default

Sizing has changed but it is also about your exercise program.
In sept. at about 165 lbs I wore a size 14, now after all these months of weight lifting I still weigh between 165 and 170 and I wear a size 10 of the same brand pants.
sharonrr1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Posts by members, moderators and admins are not considered medical advice
and no guarantee is made against accuracy.


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:24 PM.






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2